Por Eric Perkerson. (Publicado el 4 de agosto de 2010) Traducido del inglés. El artículo original se encuentra aquí http://mises.org/daily/4579 . La crisis de la Deepwater Horizon ha provocado la siguiente batalla en la interminable guerra de ideas entre partidarios de la intervención...
for the oil spill in the gulf. Well yes BP is the main reason but, the governement have decided after the Exon accident to limit the liability to around 75 000 000. Maybe anyone can tell me why that was kept so low, the refineries earn Billions a year. So why should they not be "fully" liable...
Let's see BP chef does yachting in England. And Obama sits in his white house, blaming that BP has caused the biggest envorinmental catostrophy ever. (Howerver we should not forget who has allowed them to exploit the oil in the gulf?, and who has the power to decide upon the to be granted security...
While the Associated Press blames the disaster in the Gulf on the lack of regulatory oversight, the White House's call for increasing the liability cap on oil companies belies the real culprit in this mess. Previous legislation capped oil company liability at 75 million. What reason could there possibly...
Posted to
Man, Meaning, and Freedom
by
William Green
on
Thu, May 13 2010
Filed under:
Filed under: government, libertarianism, litigation, BP, law, oil spill, environment, justice