of politician sorry deledefs. This time in the name "of saving mother nature". This times by mean of bioful. According to this: http://www.welt.de/wissenschaft/article3131881/Biokraftstoff-verbraucht-mehr-Energie-als-er-liefert.html One needs more energy to produce bioful than it yields. I...
Posted to
F Dominicus Blog
by
Friedrich Dominicus
on
Fri, Mar 4 2011
Filed under:
Filed under: belief, waste, stupidity, defraud, deledefs, end of argumentation, CO2, biofuel, fear, deception
I loved HALO. The original game. Even with XBox Live, neither HALO 2 nor HALO 3 captured the essence of the original game feel. Not only was it a great game, but it had a great soundtrack. I still listen to the album when driving from time to time. One of the best songs on the HALO soundtrack is The...
An LvMI blogger sent me the following inquiry, which I post here - along with my response - as a public service. I note first that I am no climate expert, but someone who doesn`t mind a little scientific or other inquiry. Question : "I would like to see your response to this: http://www.rationalmind...
What do climate scientists say that recently obtained data about our past climate tells us about the consequences of long-term increases in atmospheric CO2 (and other GHGs)? They tell us that we are already at levels that, if sustained (and at current sink rates it seems that CO2 has an atmospheric half...
I am posting here a brief summary that I just sent to a Mises Blog contributor, in response to an inquiry I received: Thanks for your email. First, I'm no expert but simply read. With that as background, let me respond on a few points. I think that the general scientific view is that CO2 is a GHG...
Ron Bailey of Reason , reporting from Bali, has an interesting post up summarizing the discussion by James Connaughton, director of President Bush's Council on Environmental Quality, on one small aspect of the climate conundrum, namely, what would be actually involved in meeting the energy shortfall...
There is a new paper out by economist Richard Tol that summarizes all of the economic work on climate change over the past two decades, in light of recent analyses, particularly the ground-breaking new work by Harvard's Marty Weitzman on how the "fat tail" of climate risk affects cost-benefit...
and for a legally binding UN framework to tackle climate change. Just who are these vile collectivists, red enviros, misanthropes, and others caught up in the totally groundless AGW hysteria? [Snark Alert!] Let's go to FOX News - which headlines "Top Corporations Demand Action on Global Warming"...