Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Depression of 1893?

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 6 Replies | 2 Followers

Top 25 Contributor
Male
3,113 Posts
Points 60,515
Esuric posted on Sun, Jul 12 2009 11:07 AM

I said:"As Ive mentioned already, the period between 1880-1896 saw deflation at 1.7% a year, and real incomes rise by 5% each year. This increase in real wages were felt across the board, it was completely egalitarian." I got this information from Mises.org in an audio lecture.

He said: "Go read some history books on the labour movement and the economy of the time (ie not what Murray Rothbard and libertarians say to try to gloss over it). You;ll find it was one of the worst periods in US history for workers. Also, in 1893, the US had its worst depression (till the one in the 1930s came along) in which 600 banks went bust after a frenzy of speculation on railways (lol, asset bubble leading to financial meltdown - sound familiar?), unemployment rose to 12-18% (depending on estimates) there was a run on gold, etc., etc. In fact, deflation over the latter part of the nineteenth century came both from the US reverting to the gold standard and the discovery of huge reserves of gold in Canada and South Africa. And the period to which you refer was when American monopoly capitalism was born. Not only that, but the United States' big rival, the United Kingdom, suffered badly from deflation and European markets were in crisis - a crisis resolved ultimately by European powers expanding their empires, competing for control over Africa, etc., all of which led eventually to the First World War."

Google seems to confirm his claim.

"If we wish to preserve a free society, it is essential that we recognize that the desirability of a particular object is not sufficient justification for the use of coercion."

  • | Post Points: 50

All Replies

Top 50 Contributor
1,649 Posts
Points 28,420

You should put a link to the audio you are talking about. Who is the 'he' from "his claim"?

Does "reverting to the gold standard" actually mean going away from bimetallism? 

I think you ought to look back to the Panic of 1873 and also study the Berlin Treaty of 1888 to get a better picture of what happened. I believe this 'depression' is now called the Long Depression, but was called the Great Depression before the one we all now call the GD took place.

Democracy means the opportunity to be everyone's slave.—Karl Kraus.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
3,113 Posts
Points 60,515
Esuric replied on Sun, Jul 12 2009 11:22 AM

E. R. Olovetto:
Who is the 'he' from "his claim"?

Some socialist.

E. R. Olovetto:
You should put a link to the audio you are talking about.

I don't remember which one it came from.

"If we wish to preserve a free society, it is essential that we recognize that the desirability of a particular object is not sufficient justification for the use of coercion."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
7,105 Posts
Points 115,240
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Esuric:
In fact, deflation over the latter part of the nineteenth century came both from the US reverting to the gold standard and the discovery of huge reserves of gold in Canada and South Africa.
having an inflated supply of gold is deflation is it?

also be skeptical of history written by historians touching on economic topics, there isnt a terrific track record on that sort of work, hence the power of the Rothbardian type revisionism. 

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
3,113 Posts
Points 60,515
Esuric replied on Sun, Jul 12 2009 11:28 AM

nirgrahamUK:
having an inflated supply of gold is deflation is it?

I would assume that would be inflation. Increasing the money supply, ceteris paribus, would mean inflation, no?

"If we wish to preserve a free society, it is essential that we recognize that the desirability of a particular object is not sufficient justification for the use of coercion."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
7,105 Posts
Points 115,240
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

i was being rhetorical and pointing out the poor argument presented in the quote

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
412 Posts
Points 8,630

well he never refuted the claim that real income for workers were rising even during deflation

12-18% unemployment?  Thats about as bad as the post WWI depression, less bad than the GD, and as bad as Stagflation.  So much government intervention and a fed avoiding recessions that would be worse without them

Esuric:
Not only that, but the United States' big rival, the United Kingdom, suffered badly from deflation and European markets were in crisis - a crisis resolved ultimately by European powers expanding their empires, competing for control over Africa, etc., all of which led eventually to the First World War."

hahaaha. Ok the great world wars, holocaust, communism, stalin, yada yada yada were not caused by gold backed currency and deflation rofl.  He should know better, that these wars were caused by democratic governments and Anti-Capitalist mentality, hatred for private property, and hatred of capitalism.  The most violent regimes were born from ideology.

do we get free cheezeburger in socielism?

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS