Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

100 Percent Reserve Money: The Small Change Challenge

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 5 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 500 Contributor
304 Posts
Points 6,045
ivanfoofoo posted on Wed, Jul 22 2009 3:45 PM

I just read 100 Percent Reserve Money: The Small Change Challenge (Selgin) and found that Selgin now comes with his FRB idea through the small change problem. I think that the issue of 100% gold standard or FRB is all a matter of semantics (we should define deposit as a debt or as a bailment), and despite I think that it's not fraud (it's still a free contract), it's not viable in a free society where, for example, libel law suits won't be outlawed. I think that the small change challenge would be solved by two parallel standards (as Selgin mentions in his article, but considers very difficult to apply in practice). Any opinions?

  • | Post Points: 20

All Replies

Top 10 Contributor
Male
5,538 Posts
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Wed, Jul 22 2009 3:48 PM
No opinions. Just the fact that small change is a non-problem that only exists in Selgin's mind. Well other people who want to sell their non-solutions to non-problems may share Selgin's ideas, granted.

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
2,491 Posts
Points 43,390

Juan:
No opinions. Just the fact that small change is a non-problem that only exists in Selgin's mind. Well other people who want to sell their non-solutions to non-problems may share Selgin's ideas, granted.

 

GilesStratton:

Allowed Authors:

  • Rothbard, all works.
  • Rand, all works (read carefully though)
  • Hoppe, all works (read carefully though)
  • Block, all works

Authors who should be avoided:

  • Mises (he can be ambiguous)
  • Hayek (he's a commie)
  • Boettke (heretic)
  • Selgin (he's in the employment of the FRS)
  • White (see above)
  • Yeager (he denied that Rothbard supported argumentation ethics, thus catching himself in a PERFORMATIVE CONTRADICTION!)
  • James Buchanan (he said the state was voluntary)
  • Gordon Tullock (see above)
  • Don Lavoie (I didn't want to name him, the fewer people that read this black sheep the better)
  • Steven Horwitz (see above)
  • Dave Prychitko (see above)
  • Israel Kirzner (he's OK, but he disagrees with Rothbard)
  • All other economics (they're evil, state apologists and just not as good as Rothbard).

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
5,538 Posts
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Wed, Jul 22 2009 4:38 PM
lol. There's something really wrong (with you) when the only 'authority' you can invoke is his majesty Stratton.

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,221 Posts
Points 34,050
Moderator

Juan:
lol. There's something really wrong (with you) when the only 'authority' you can invoke is his majesty Stratton.

Even a "broken" libertarian is right twice a day.

"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
5,538 Posts
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Wed, Jul 22 2009 7:20 PM
I've noticed that the ultimate 'argument' against people who have no faith in the FRB cult is to call them 'rothbardian'.

Have you ever seen that ? Maybe it is a fallacy of sorts ?

X : presents flawed monetary system
Y: points out flaws in theory
X: oh my god ! you are a ROTHBARDIAN !!!!
X now feels better.

Yet I don't think that's right, not even twice a day.

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS