Heated conversation about Congressman dying in plane crash takes place in hotel lobby
Paul Joseph Watson Friday, June 1, 2012
During a heated conversation in the lobby of the Westfields Marriott hotel yesterday, Bilderberg members expressed their desire to see Ron Paul die in a plane crash, according to veteran journalist Jim Tucker’s inside source.
The close up shot was necessary to eliminate background noise. A full interview with Jim Tucker (AmericanFreePress.net) will be posted later.
The shocking exchange took place just after Bilderberg attendees started arriving yesterday morning as they were driven through crowds of hundreds of Paul-supporting demonstrators.
Wasting no time to shoot their mouths off, one Bilderberg member expressed his desire to, “Get Ron Paul and all of his supporters on an airplane with a Muslim suicide pilot and take ‘em down,” according to Tucker’s source, which has been proven routinely accurate with Bilderberg information in the past.
“That was the harshest comment made but there were a lot of mean-spirited comments made as the Bilderberg boys gathered in the lobby of the hotel,” added Tucker.
Tucker explained that the Bilderbergers are becoming increasingly irate at the resistance amongst patriotic Americans to their program, with protest figures rising at each annual confab. [...]
The man is 72 years old. Granted he is in excellent condition, certainly better than the hypocritical chain smoking current dude in the White House, and the Hostile Take Over Director and all around weird dude running against him. But still RP doesn't have an infinite time to play politics and his son is nowhere near as principled.
>infowars.com
Sorry, John. Stopped reading there.
Ron Paul was 72 years old four years ago.
And yes, the damage is done. The last thing these globalists need is a tragic death to close out the storybook rise to prominence of what will prove to be one of the most influential figures in American history. (That, plus the poke it would be in the proverbial hornet's nest of NWO conspiracy theorists. Really that's all they need is the whole Alex Jones crowd ignited with a vigor like never before, with new members joining every minute, basically straight from Ron Paul's campaign mailing list.)
mustang19:>infowars.com Sorry, John. Stopped reading there.
I guess I should be sorry...I didn't realize you were under the impression you needed to apologize for not reading something I posted. But I'll go ahead and fix what's bothering you.
:EDIT:
Better?
I'm not trying to belittle the significance of the threat, but didn't the Bilderberg Group support Rick Perry?
I mean, this is disconcerting, but it isn't certain- right?
If I had a cake and ate it, it can be concluded that I do not have it anymore. HHH
ThatOldGuy:I'm not trying to belittle the significance of the threat, but didn't the Bilderberg Group support Rick Perry?
Source?
John James:Source?
http://www.dailypaul.com/180953/rick-perry-confronted-again-about-bilderberg-group-charlotte-nc
http://www.infowars.com/bilderberg-convenes-as-rick-perry-hinges-on-2012-run/
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/perry_bilderberg_271.html
I'm not entirely certain that it's true- and I am not claiming that it is- I just recall skimming a headline about it at one point.
Interesting. Yeah I recall at the end of Endgame the old guy who follows Bilderberg all over the world to every meeting anticipated that Perry would be doing a presidential run because Jones reported to him that the Dallas newspaper reported that Perry was attending the meeting that year in Turkey. However...that was 2007.
And yeah...considering his abysmal performance this time around, I'd say "ace in the hole" isn't exactly the way I'd put it.
This is a good question, but there are many explanations. It could have been to control the dialogue onstage, they might have thought of him as a rebel (remember Texas Secessionism?), they might've wanted him to soak up attention late into the race, etc.
Remember that bizarre moment when he forgot what he was counting? Is he really really stupid? Or was he no longer required?
The Anarch is to the Anarchist what the Monarch is to the Monarchist. -Ernst Jünger
John James: Ron Paul was 72 years old four years ago. And yes, the damage is done. The last thing these globalists need is a tragic death to close out the storybook rise to prominence of what will prove to be one of the most influential figures in American history. (That, plus the poke it would be in the proverbial hornet's nest of NWO conspiracy theorists. Really that's all they need is the whole Alex Jones crowd ignited with a vigor like never before, with new members joining every minute, basically straight from Ron Paul's campaign mailing list.)
I think it would drive further into the bunker those of us who are already paranoid; but yeah, the AJ crowd would be ignited in vigor. However, the neocons would be happy as would the Dems/socialists/commies and anyone else who is pro state. Thus, I can't see there being mass public outrage like there was when Travon was killed. But I definately do agree what it would ignite a huge grassroots movement that would go beyond the AJ crowd; however, it would depend on how the cover up was handled. If people believe it was "simple" mechanical failure of the airplane, then there wouldn't be much for the people go off of until there was leak of info/evidence that RP was murdered.
To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process. Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!" Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."
It feels like bad omens reading this thread.
Thanks John. But Infowars? Alex Jones? I better start citing Russia Today.
There are plenty of legit RPers getting beat up stories without citing conspiracy websites.
I recall posting this on the Campaign Against Ron Paul topic. Good to know youve changed your mind about infowars.
mustang19:Thanks John. But Infowars? Alex Jones? I better start citing Russia Today.
Why?
Because there's just not enough room on the forum?
Freedom4Me73986:I recall posting this on the Campaign Against Ron Paul topic. Good to know youve changed your mind about infowars.
My mind has changed? What was it before? What is it now??
I don't know. Why do you think a guy who thinks a cabal of Jew elites runs the world is a legit news source?
Actually, don't answer that.
mustang19:I don't know. Why do you think a guy who thinks a cabal of Jew elites runs the world is a legit news source? Actually, don't answer that.
From what I understand, Alex Jones doesn't think that.
The keyboard is mightier than the gun.
Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.
Voluntaryism Forum
Regardless, Infowars is generally junk and not worth your time if you want to be taken seriously. There's so much junk. Might as well be listening to Coast to Coast AM and citing that as a legitimate news source.
Alex Jones is a self-confessed zionist and most likely a disinformation agent.
mustang19:Why do you think a guy who thinks a cabal of Jew elites runs the world is a legit news source?
Who are you talking about?
I don't know who runs Russia Today.
TheBomb19:Alex Jones is a self-confessed zionist