Pretty dang awesome:
I posted this on reddit:
I like it, but I feel like it's too unfocused to be persuasive to anybody not already initiated. "George Ought to Help" is great because it's a simple concept that's well executed and relatively brief. This video gets into like 6 different ancap topics with visually distracting and inexplicably weird cartoon characters (are they halloween costumes or...?), changes in setting, a lot of different, changing hypothetical scenarios etc. Too much IMO. I doubt I'll use it.
I hate to be critical of it because it is well done, but I think it falls short of the standard of "George" and "Edgar" as a persuasive introduction to libertarian philosophy.
OMG
Stephen Adkins: I posted this on reddit: I like it, but I feel like it's too unfocused to be persuasive to anybody not already initiated. "George Ought to Help" is great because it's a simple concept that's well executed and relatively brief. This video gets into like 6 different ancap topics with visually distracting and inexplicably weird cartoon characters (are they halloween costumes or...?), changes in setting, a lot of different, changing hypothetical scenarios etc. Too much IMO. I doubt I'll use it. I hate to be critical of it because it is well done, but I think it falls short of the standard of "George" and "Edgar" as a persuasive introduction to libertarian philosophy.
That's interesting, because I felt similarly about Edgar. It seemed too complex for a newbie to fully grasp and appreciate.
But I actually find this one great. Sure it's a bit longer, but I didn't find the characters or scene changes distracting or confusing at all. In fact that's how it should be done. It's basically a rule of cinema...you almost never see a character actually telling a story...you just show the story.
I think this one is incredibly well done and I think it serves well as a follow-up. It obviously tackles virtually all the immediate questions that came up after George.
Kudos Bitbutter. This will totally get shared by me.
it falls short of the standard of "George" and "Edgar" as a persuasive introduction to libertarian philosophy. That's interesting, because I felt similarly about Edgar.
it falls short of the standard of "George" and "Edgar" as a persuasive introduction to libertarian philosophy.
That's interesting, because I felt similarly about Edgar.
Now that you mention it, I agree. Edgar tried to distill the concepts of minimum wages and really supply & demand into a digestible video designed for somebody apparently unfamiliar with economics. No short order and I'm not sure how well it succeeded, as I haven't sent it to anybody who isn't already libertarian.
I agree that it's not as focused (and neither was Edgar). Still, it answers objections to George.
phenomenal !!
'Like' the George Ought to Help series on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/georgeoughttohelp
You Can Always Leave is a crowd-funded follow-up to George Ought to Help, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGMQZEIXBMs
Additional thanks: http://www.georgeoughttohelp.com/ycal_thankyou.html
Would you like to be notified about crowd-funding campaigns for similar projects in the future? Submit your email address here:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFRyLS1yMmt0M2x1X0lxZS13amRKa1E6MQ
Translations
If you'd like to provide a translation for the film's captions:
1. Copy the URL of the video to your clipboard.
2. Go to http://mike.thedt.net/ytsubs/ytsubs.php
3. Paste the url from your clipboard into the field on the 'closed captions ripper' page, and download the 'English' caption file.
4. Edit and save the the file in a text editor (The file has to be edited as plain text to be compatible with YouTube. Notepad or Textedit both allow plaintext editing) and send the translated version to info at redshiftmedia dot com. Be sure to include the name of the language you translated it to and your name as you'd like it to appear in the translation credits list.