Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Obama to Drop Poland, Czech Missile Defense Proposal

rated by 0 users
This post has 54 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
Posts 419
Points 8,260
Capital Pumper Posted: Sun, Sep 20 2009 3:20 AM

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=abY5sSXoN_wo

The Polish people I am acquainted with, think that Obama is an idiot for doing this.

 

  • | Post Points: 110
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,651
Points 51,325
Moderator

Yeah, I noticed that. Now, all of a sudden, Poles seem to hate Obama. I find this actually quite funny, since I am Polish, but if I were to be the President of the United States I would definitely cut this program. The worst part though is that Obama cut the program on the "anniversary" of the Soviet invasion of Poland during WWII.

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 48
Points 660

krazy kaju:

The worst part though is that Obama cut the program on the "anniversary" of the Soviet invasion of Poland during WWII.

Exactly! It reminds so many of us about the Yalta... BIG mistake!

But...

At least we know clearly how "precious" we are for the U.S. government.

Our supposed "friend" has spat right in our face...

 Well!

"You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free."

It will be very beneficial to us eventually...

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,129
Points 16,635
Giant_Joe replied on Sun, Sep 20 2009 11:32 AM

That's the story I get from the Poles, too. Ironic thing is, though, that the missile defense system would make Poland the first target for nuclear missiles. The US has just saved Poland from a potential Russian nuclear bombardment by ending an aspect of an "entangling alliance" with them. This is one step closer to world peace. :)

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 40
Points 1,005
Cortex replied on Sun, Sep 20 2009 11:46 AM

Ah, peace for our times. We are somewhat sensitive to such stuff here in Central Europe.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,538
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Sun, Sep 20 2009 1:37 PM
Aww. The poor and patriotic military contractors won't be selling their useless junk. That's pretty bad for the economy...

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,221
Points 34,050
Moderator

Juan:
Aww. The poor and patriotic military contractors won't be selling their useless junk. That's pretty bad for the economy...


  They took our jobs!

"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,914
Points 70,630

i read a news report that Obama is having the missiles staying and brought in by the navy (of course different kind of missiles) and the a deal is on the table to get them into Turkey.  There's rumors (saw it blogged at Lew Rockwell) that missiles might go to Georgia.  The more ramped up developments with Iran is making all of this more of a geo-political shift - nothing more nor less.  Look for some trade-off with Russia in some form or fashion.  Of course Obama will play it up that he is for peace, but it's a lie.

"Do not put out the fire of the spirit." 1The 5:19
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,914
Points 70,630

others may have seen this.  report says:

"'Barack Obama, the US president, said a day earlier that the decision to abandon the Bush administration’s plans was taken after a change in Washington’s perception of the threat posed by Iran.

Following a review, US intelligence decided short- and medium-range missiles from Iran now pose a greater near-term threat than the intercontinental ballistic missiles the Bush plan addressed.A new missile-defence plan would rely on a network of sensors and interceptor missiles based at sea, on land and in the air as a bulwark against Iranian short- and medium-range missiles, said Robert Gates, the US defence secretary....

In his speech, Rasmussen said long-range ballistic missile technology in the hands of such countries as North Korea and Iran threatened the West and Russia in large part because it could lead to regional proliferation.

“If North Korea stays nuclear, and if Iran becomes nuclear, some of their neighbours might feel compelled to follow their example,” he said.'"

i've read this in other news sources, but can't remember where, but there ya go.

"Do not put out the fire of the spirit." 1The 5:19
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,651
Points 51,325
Moderator

Byzantine:
I think that the Poles are idiots

You are so high cultured.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 419
Points 8,260

krazy kaju:

Byzantine:
I think that the Poles are idiots

You are so high cultured.

Always with the culture when it comes to Poles.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 13
Points 230

Well the timing is certainly off - rather amateurish.  I think the decision is a sound one.

Ska is lame and so am I.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,943
Points 49,130
SystemAdministrator
Conza88 replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 10:18 AM

Byzantine:

krazy kaju:
You are so high cultured.

Anarchists don't believe in culture.  Statist.

http://mises.org/journals/jls/11_1/11_1_1.pdf

Ron Paul is for self-government when compared to the Constitution. He's an anarcho-capitalist. Proof.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 11,343
Points 194,945
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Byzantine:

Conza88:

Byzantine:

krazy kaju:
You are so high cultured.

Anarchists don't believe in culture.  Statist.

http://mises.org/journals/jls/11_1/11_1_1.pdf

 

Please.  I don't read the lunatic screeds of xenophobes.

This stopped being funny awhile ago, even if people are being sarcastic.  Might be time to get back to discussing the OP.

"When you're young you worry about people stealing your ideas, when you're old you worry that they won't." - David Friedman
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,221
Points 34,050
Moderator
Nitroadict replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 12:24 PM

liberty student:

Byzantine:

Conza88:

Byzantine:

krazy kaju:
You are so high cultured.

Anarchists don't believe in culture.  Statist.

http://mises.org/journals/jls/11_1/11_1_1.pdf

 

Please.  I don't read the lunatic screeds of xenophobes.

This stopped being funny awhile ago, even if people are being sarcastic.  Might be time to get back to discussing the OP.

I honestly couldn't tell; the sarcasm was so dry I thought the thread was in the Sahara.

"Look at me, I'm quoting another user to show how wrong I think they are, out of arrogance of my own position. Wait, this is my own quote, oh shi-" ~ Nitroadict

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 13
Points 230

Actually, the majority of Poles agree with the decision (and the margin would probably have been wider if it occurred on a better day):

48% favor the move compared to 31% opposed

Ska is lame and so am I.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 574
Points 9,305
Natalie replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 1:43 PM

They haven't scrapped it entirely, rather changed the technology to be deployed (and it's going to be delayed as well). I have no idea if it's going to be more efficient or less expensive, the reports are conflicting.

Judging by the Russian media, Russian government was less concerned with a few missiles in Poland and Czech Republic (not a big threat to Russia anyway) than with the proposed Czech radar that would see all of the European part of Russia to the Ural Mountains. So NATO is probably going to use the Russian radar in the Caucasus mountains against the possible threat from Iran which suits Russia just fine.

I suspect that Obama and Putin/Medvedev have reached some kind of a bargain: US changes the missile doctrine to more palatable to the Russians while Russia won't sell long-range missile systems to Iran.

If I hear not allowed much oftener; said Sam, I'm going to get angry.

J.R.R.Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,538
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 1:49 PM
Too bad. But Iran will get their missiles anyway, sooner or latter. The sooner the better.

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 574
Points 9,305
Natalie replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 1:58 PM

It's certainly going to be better (as in more lucrative) for the military and defense contractors who will ask for more funding in response.

If I hear not allowed much oftener; said Sam, I'm going to get angry.

J.R.R.Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 11,343
Points 194,945
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Juan:
Too bad. But Iran will get their missiles anyway, sooner or latter. The sooner the better.

Indeed, the Iranian people are at a big disadvantage, in that they cannot defend themselves against potential attackers.

Look at how much the west has backed off threatening and bullying North Korea since they bettered their armament.

Violence, only respects violence.  A sad consequence of imperial times.

"When you're young you worry about people stealing your ideas, when you're old you worry that they won't." - David Friedman
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 414
Points 5,255
Saan replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 2:14 PM

Wow this is all smoke and mirrors guys.  Whatever you see on TV about military actions is 100% BS.  It is a line and nothing more.  All of those missiles will most likely still go to Poland, and Russia will most likely still counter.  You just won't hear about it anymore.   Can I provide you proof? Nope.  All I can say, is that the polices given to the public are contrary to the polices carried out. I use to carry out the contrary policies. Sorry about that. I was wrong.

Don't waste your time.

 Criminals, there ought to be a law.

Criminals there ought to be a whole lot more.   Bon Scott.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 48
Points 660

Byzantine:

Well back on topic then, why, exactly, do the Poles think Obama is an "idiot" for doing this

[...]

why is it up to American taxpayers to foot the bill for the defense of Europe against Russia,
Iran, or any other neo-con hobgoblin?

 

As far as I know Americans wanted first and foremost to defend themselves.
We - the great majority of Poles - did not want their missiles on our land.

We understood clearly that it would be a great problem for us - not real advantage.

I do not care if Obama is an idiot or not - that is Americans' problem - not Poles'.

;-)

Remember just one thing...

For Poles September 17 is a far, far, far worse day than e.g.

December 7 or September 11 for Americans...

For us September 17 is an open and vividly hurting wound - a treason wound!

Therefore...

We perceive this as American signal given to Russia...

:-/

Now think of the quality of Obama's i.e. U.S. government foreign policy...

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 7,105
Points 115,240
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Juan:
Too bad. But Iran will get their missiles anyway, sooner or latter. The sooner the better.
liberty student:
Indeed, the Iranian people are at a big disadvantage, in that they cannot defend themselves against potential attackers.
the iranian state is not the iranian people. the iranian people suffer the iranian state just like we suffer ours. 

just sayin'

Where there is no property there is no justice; a proposition as certain as any demonstration in Euclid

Fools! not to see that what they madly desire would be a calamity to them as no hands but their own could bring

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 11,343
Points 194,945
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

nirgrahamUK:

the iranian state is not the iranian people. the iranian people suffer the iranian state just like we suffer ours. 

just sayin'

What are you saying?

 

"When you're young you worry about people stealing your ideas, when you're old you worry that they won't." - David Friedman
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,538
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 5:19 PM
Granted, but given the existence of rogue states like the american state and the israeli state, it makes sense for the iranian state to acquire weapons so as to check the deranged plans of other deranged people like themselves.

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,651
Points 51,325
Moderator

Byzantine:

Well back on topic then, why, exactly, do the Poles think Obama is an "idiot" for doing this and, next question, what's stopping them and all the other European nations from building their own damned missile defense system.  Stated another way, why is it up to American taxpayers to foot the bill for the defense of Europe against Russia, Iran, or any other neo-con hobgoblin?

Did anyone actually oppose Obama's move before your inflammatory and uncivil comment?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 11,343
Points 194,945
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Byzantine:
Read the original post, polski.

Clean it up or take a hike.

"When you're young you worry about people stealing your ideas, when you're old you worry that they won't." - David Friedman
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,055
Points 41,895

In 1941 the Red Cross in Poland discovered the executed bodies of the entire Polish officer corp and determined that it was done by the Soviets.  FDR swept it under the rug.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 244
Points 5,455
Felipe replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 7:11 PM

Juan:
Granted, but given the existence of rogue states like the american state and the israeli state, it makes sense for the iranian state to acquire weapons so as to check the deranged plans of other deranged people like themselves.

Would you be willing to concede that an islamic dictatorship has less legitimacy than a constitutional republic?

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 11,343
Points 194,945
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Felipe:
Would you be willing to concede that an islamic dictatorship has less legitimacy than a constitutional republic?

What about a constitutional dictatorship and an islamic republic?

"When you're young you worry about people stealing your ideas, when you're old you worry that they won't." - David Friedman
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 244
Points 5,455
Felipe replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 7:29 PM

liberty student:

Felipe:
Would you be willing to concede that an islamic dictatorship has less legitimacy than a constitutional republic?

What about a constitutional dictatorship and an islamic republic?

But doesnt the term "constitutional" implies that there is a respect for certain individual rights? and doesnt "islamic" implies a theocracy?

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 419
Points 8,260

Juan:

it makes sense for the iranian state to acquire weapons so as to check the deranged plans of other deranged people like themselves.

By selling the missiles to other deranged people like themselves.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,538
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 7:36 PM
Would you be willing to concede that an islamic dictatorship has less legitimacy than a constitutional republic?
Maybe, but that has nothing to do with what I said ? I said that the american government and its accomplices are rogue states and that it makes sense for other rogue states (like the iranian state) to defend themselves.

I'm saying that given the complete lawlessness of the american military, other states are 'justified' in acquiring weapons 'for defense'.

. And actually as far as military operations go, the american state has probably less legitimacy than the iranian state. As far as I can tell the iranian military don't have bases all over the world.

No constitutional republic in sight, I'm afraid (such entity actually was a myth, you know...)

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 168
Points 2,295

The CCCP had a constitution.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,538
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Mon, Sep 21 2009 7:41 PM
Capital Pumper:
By selling the missiles to other deranged people like themselves.
Probably my post wasn't very clear. What I'm saying is that given the evil madmen who run the american and israeli military/governments, I see no reason why the madmen who run the iranian government should be at a disadvantage when it comes to weapons.

Why should the american military be able to nuke iran, but the iranians should not be able to nuke NYC ?

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 2 (55 items) 1 2 Next > | RSS