Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

"Rothbard's Law"

rated by 0 users
This post has 13 Replies | 5 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,687
Points 48,995
Jonathan M. F. Catalán Posted: Tue, Dec 29 2009 2:28 PM

So, recently I've been hearing a lot usage of "Godwin's Law".  The law is as follows:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.

Now, this thread is meant to be humurous (although, admittedly, my "intellectual humor" is not too great), but after reading a few threads (and after reading that new thread on airport security), I want to christen "Rothbard's Law", which should read:

As an online libertarian discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to absolute tyranny approaches 1.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Jonathan M. F. Catalán:

So, recently I've been hearing a lot usage of "Godwin's Law".  The law is as follows:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.

Now, this thread is meant to be humurous (although, admittedly, my "intellectual humor" is not too great), but after reading a few threads (and after reading that new thread on airport security), I want to christen "Rothbard's Law", which should read:

As an online libertarian discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to absolute tyranny approaches 1.

There's already a Rothbard's law. It's: "People tend to specialize in what they are worst at."

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,687
Points 48,995

Well, I could name it after myself (Catalán's Law), but then even less people would use it than they would otherwise. Stick out tongue

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

Ok, I got one. "As an online libertarian discussion grows longer, the probability of someone claiming that "might makes right" approaches 1."

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 83
Points 1,260

AS the length of an online libertarian discussion increases, the probability of an argument over a reference to Rothbard approaches 1.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,538
Points 93,790
Juan replied on Tue, Dec 29 2009 4:10 PM
"As an online libertarian discussion grows longer, the probability of someone claiming that "might makes right" approaches 1."

Hehe. I vote for that one ^^

February 17 - 1600 - Giordano Bruno is burnt alive by the catholic church.
Aquinas : "much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 850
Points 13,615

When Rothbard isn't mentioned, the chance of it not being a libertarian discussion is one.

The state is not the enemy. The idea of the state is. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 696
Points 12,900
AnonLLF replied on Sat, Jan 23 2010 12:40 PM

I propose Scott's law: Individuals generally attack most vehemently the ideas they themselves once held.

Examples are :  walter block who used to be a socialist now attacking it or Hoppe once being a social democrat now attacking democracy .

 

 

I don't really want to comment or read anything here.I have near zero in common with many of you.I may return periodically when there's something you need to know.

Near Mutualist/Libertarian Socialist.

 

Not Ranked
Male
Posts 86
Points 1,225

Jonathan M. F. Catalán:
As an online libertarian discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to absolute tyranny approaches 1.

Since you already mentioned it in this forum, doesn't that make it just slightly self-fulfilling? Can I get a touche!? Stick out tongue

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 249
Points 3,450
hugolp replied on Sat, Jan 23 2010 12:53 PM

Scott F:

I propose Scott's law: Individuals generally attack most vehemently the ideas they themselves once held.

Examples are :  walter block who used to be a socialist now attacking it or Hoppe once being a social democrat now attacking democracy .

 

 

+1 It happens to me too.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 836
Points 15,370
abskebabs replied on Sat, Jan 23 2010 12:57 PM

Scott F:

I propose Scott's law: Individuals generally attack most vehemently the ideas they themselves once held.

Examples are :  walter block who used to be a socialist now attacking it or Hoppe once being a social democrat now attacking democracy .

Holy s*** dude, I like that one! For me it's positivism I think.

"When the King is far the people are happy."  Chinese proverb

For Alexander Zinoviev and the free market there is a shared delight:

"Where there are problems there is life."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 696
Points 12,900
AnonLLF replied on Sat, Jan 23 2010 1:20 PM

Thanks guys.

It's been my little pet theory for quite a while now.

I've had it happen to me. for example when I was a kid I was a christian and by my teenage years I started to hate christianity (I have a more fair minded view of it now.) or a better example ,in 2008 I was a minarchist and now I'm deeply critical of it.

I don't really want to comment or read anything here.I have near zero in common with many of you.I may return periodically when there's something you need to know.

Near Mutualist/Libertarian Socialist.

 

Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 414
Points 6,780
MatthewF replied on Sat, Jan 23 2010 1:24 PM

Me too. Minarchism is upsetting to me on a DEEP level. Having been one myself...

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,051
Points 36,080
Bert replied on Sat, Jan 23 2010 2:10 PM

There should be a compilation of the various "Laws of Rothbard".  I remember him having a couple.  Lew Rockwell's law: Whatever the government tells you, believe the opposite.

As far as this forum is concerned, here's a couple "laws"...

"When hard debates approach, an army of strawmen will arise"

"As far as intellectual property, you can't copyright this conversation"

"Statistics without theory is like ingredients without the directions"

"When people feel morally correct, they feel obligated to use force - by the State"

"Once in a while you'll come across a man with a plan - a central plan"

"Picking a Statist out of a room of an-cap is liking picking the bad apple out the bushel"


I had always been impressed by the fact that there are a surprising number of individuals who never use their minds if they can avoid it, and an equal number who do use their minds, but in an amazingly stupid way. - Carl Jung, Man and His Symbols
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (14 items) | RSS