Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Top psychiatrist concludes liberals clinically nuts

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,175
Points 17,905
Moderator
SystemAdministrator
Inquisitor Posted: Mon, Feb 18 2008 6:42 PM

WASHINGTON - Just when liberals thought it was safe to start
identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is
making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental
disorder.

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals
relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our
freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new
book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political
Madness." "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal
responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government
meet their needs from cradle to grave."

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made
similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a
life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing
conspiracy."

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500
patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more
than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic
psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the
University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major
candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only
be understood as a psychological disorder.

Continued.

 Not sure if this is true, but if so it's funny.

 

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 481
Points 7,280
DBratton replied on Mon, Feb 18 2008 7:56 PM

 Echos of Mises' "Fourier Complex"

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,205
Points 20,670
JAlanKatz replied on Mon, Feb 18 2008 9:56 PM

I'd take this as yet another example of what's wrong with psychiatry.  If he's free of right-wing bias why isn't he identifying as nuts people who support torture, hate civil rights, and sing songs about bombing countries?

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 57
Points 930

This is brilliant and make a lot of sence.  It explains why liberals (modern) think the way they do.  I've often questoned why someone would really think (or rather fail to think) like that.  Very short term, emotion based opinions are irrational.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 698
Points 12,045
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

JAlanKatz:

I'd take this as yet another example of what's wrong with psychiatry.  If he's free of right-wing bias why isn't he identifying as nuts people who support torture, hate civil rights, and sing songs about bombing countries?

 

 

LOL! Good point. So both left-liberals and conservatives are immature adults: the left act like spoiled children and the right like homicidal sociopaths.

Yours in liberty,
Geoffrey Allan Plauché, Ph.D.
Adjunct Instructor, Buena Vista University
Webmaster, LibertarianStandard.com
Founder / Executive Editor, Prometheusreview.com

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,175
Points 17,905
Moderator
SystemAdministrator
Both are trapped in cognitive dissonance, the conservative as much (if not more so) than the 'liberal'.

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 11
Points 160
Ennio45 replied on Tue, Feb 19 2008 4:14 PM
 They are both completely rational. They see what they want, and they do whatever they have to to get it. Half-truths and supressed evidence may seem irrational, but in reality they are simply tools of winning the debate for their side, and the reason for being on that side is power. Each version of state and society has power invested in one particular group. In our society it's the "political class", in theocracies it's the clergy, and under communism it's the bureaucratic class.
"Away with every concern that is not altogether my concern? What's good, what's bad? Why, I myself am my concern and I am neither good nor bad. Neither has any meaning for me" Max Stirner
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS