It was posted by the professor; I have no idea where the guy teaches, but as with virtually every Mises Academy class, all the readings are free and online.
No readings
Plato, Euthyphro (http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/euthyfro.html)
Section 1: Religion
Aquinas, excerpt from Summa Theologica (http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/aquinas3.html)
Paley, excerpt from Natural Theology
(http://philosophy.lander.edu/intro/articles/paley-a.pdf)
Gould, excerpt from The Panda’s Thumb (http://faculty.washington.edu/lynnhank/Gould.pdf)
Anselm, excerpt from Proslogion (plus replies)
(http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/anselm.html)
Mackie, “Evil and omnipotence”
(http://faculty.unlv.edu/jwood/unlv/evilomnipotence.pdf)
Pascal, excerpt from Pensées
(http://www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/web%20publishing/Pascal_Wager.htm)
James, excerpt from “The will to believe”
(http://educ.jmu.edu//~omearawm/ph101willtobelieve.html)
Section 2: Knowledge
Descartes, Meditation I
(http://www.filepedia.org/meditations-on-first-philosophy)
Moore, “Proof of an external world”
(http://web.mac.com/cludwig/Site/Philosophie_de_la_connaissance_files/moore.pdf)
Putnam, “Brains in a vat”
(http://www.cavehill.uwi.edu/bnccde/ph29a/putnam.html)
Hume, excerpt from An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding
(http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfbits/he1.pdf) (Section IV)
Goodman, excerpt from Fact, Fiction and Forecast
(http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/1702_jnrsnr_seminar/docs/goodman.pdf)
Section 3: Mind and Body
Nagel, “What is it like to be a bat?”
(http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/nagel_nice.html)
Descartes, Meditation VI, 9-19
Jackson, “What Mary didn’t know”
(jorgemlg.googlepages.com/jackson-whatmarydidntknow.pdf)
Smart, “Sensations and brain processes”
(henry.laycock.googlepages.com/sensations.pdf)
Fri Mar 12 – NO CLASS
Lewis, “Mad pain and Martian pain”
(http://web.missouri.edu/johnsonrn/papers/lewis.pdf)
Searle, “Minds, brains, and programs”
(http://web.archive.org/web/20071210043312/http://members.aol.com/NeoNoetics/MindsBrainsPrograms.html)
Section 4: Free Will and Personal Identity
Williams, “The self and the future”
(http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/content/BPL_Images/Content_store/Sample_chapter/9780631234418/001.pdf)
Locke, excerpt from Essay Concerning Human Understanding
(http://ethnicity.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Texts/locke227.html)
Reid, excerpt from Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man
(http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/pi/reid.html)
Dennett, “Where am I?”
(http://www.newbanner.com/SecHumSCM/WhereAmI.html)
Holbach, excerpt from The System of Nature
(Available in entirety on Google books. Read first 10-15 pgs. of ch. 11)
Ayer, “Freedom and necessity”
(http://psych.dbourget.com/readings/Ayer.pdf)
Section 5: Ethics
Mill, excerpt from Utilitarianism
(Available in entirety on Google books. Read Ch. 2)
Kant, excerpt from Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
(http://www.earlymoderntexts.com/pdfbits/kgw1.pdf)
Rachels, “The challenge of cultural relativism”
(http://www.unc.edu/courses/2005ss1/phil/020/002/Rachels.pdf)
Thomson, “A defense of abortion”
(http://www.jhu.edu/choice/files/adefenseofabortion.pdf)
Singer, “Famine, affluence, and morality”
(http://commonsenseatheism.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Singer-Famine-Affluence-and-Morality.pdf)
Gracias
Sweet, man. Thanks for that. I was very confused until I realized that you said "philosophy" and not "psychology".
Some comments:
About knowledge -no intuitionism or innate ideas? no infalliblism? Also, there's nothing about deduction.
Second, the use of Singer -this probably will put up another roadblock to ancap but I have no essential argument against singer's ideas, being that I don't really know them all that well except that he holds a sort of utilitarian defense of animal rights.
Interesting, in my Civil Wars and Revolutions class my professor also has all of the readings be online and free. Interestingly enough, he is a libertarian and our faculty advisor for our campus YAL chapter.
"Man thinks not only for the sake of thinking, but also in order to act."-Ludwig von Mises
fakename: Some comments: About knowledge -no intuitionism or innate ideas? no infalliblism? Also, there's nothing about deduction. Second, the use of Singer -this probably will put up another roadblock to ancap but I have no essential argument against singer's ideas, being that I don't really know them all that well except that he holds a sort of utilitarian defense of animal rights.
At least in this interview with Richard Dawkins, Singer's defense of animal rights seem deontological to me.
Thanks for posting this!
If I had a cake and ate it, it can be concluded that I do not have it anymore. HHH