A "cartel" is simply profit sharing. The reason that competition per se exists is obvious. Some know that they can take it all and some know that they can lose it all. Only losers are interested in sharing for greater material gain.
Why would you join a cartel in a free market? Can't you just undercut them and make more money?
I find your lack of faith to be disturbing.
Heretics and doubters must be cleansed...
with fire.
CrazyCoot:I find your lack of faith to be disturbing. Heretics and doubters must be cleansed... with fire.
Are you with the IPCC?
Yes, The Institution of Pious Capitalist Crusaders
Those who do not believe in the NAP and voluntary exchange must be destroyed.
What does it mean to doubt capitalism? If it means doubting its perfection, then that's not even up for question. No human thing is perfect. If it means entertaining the notion that anything salutary can be done about any imperfections that may occur via a market process, then the other side of that coin is a necessarily concomitant faith in the efficacy of some non-market action in remedying that imperfection without creating worse ones. So then you have to ask yourself what is so meritorious about that given non-market action to warrant such faith.
Heretic.
Smiling Dave:Now Rothbard writes that if the cartel really does benefit them all somehow, then that means they should merge outright.
EmperorNero: Smiling Dave:Now Rothbard writes that if the cartel really does benefit them all somehow, then that means they should merge outright.Why don't companies constantly merge when that would give them control over some market?
Inefficiencies of internal (non-market) capital transfers.
Daniel James Sanchez:Inefficiencies of internal (non-market) capital transfers.
Could you dumb it down a little?
EmperorNero: Daniel James Sanchez:Inefficiencies of internal (non-market) capital transfers. Could you dumb it down a little?
I explain it here: http://blog.mises.org/12799/on-chapter-1-of-kleins-new-book/
I don't expect perfection of capitalism, so I don't "doubt" it. I'm not so much a believer in capitalism as free, voluntary interactions, and there is little that can shake my support for such an ideology, i.e. succumb to the notion that people are too "stupid" for their "own good" etc.
With respect to economics/praxeology, I always keep a reasonably open mind, because like an knowledge-seeking endeavour it can be expanded and at times, revised.
Freedom of markets is positively correlated with the degree of evolution in any society...
I do follow Wittgenstein's idea that you can't have certainty without a little doubt.