Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

The pros of Ron Paul's retirement from Congress.

rated by 0 users
This post has 14 Replies | 8 Followers

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator
DanielMuff Posted: Thu, Jul 14 2011 2:40 AM
(assuming he doesn't become president) More time to dedicate to: Writing books (published by LvMI) and articles (Mises Dailies); Giving speeches (Mises Circles, etc.), and radio and TV appearences. He could become a lecturer at a university. He could have his own TV (or Internet) show; maybe co-host with the Judge. Add your own.

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 80
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator
Formatting isn't working. Oh wellz.

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,051
Points 36,080
Bert replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 3:04 AM

Not holding a seat in Congress really makes DC a hell hole.  One of the few honest politicians.  Yet, upsides I see in not being bound to being a public servant would be going around and giving speeches and campaigning for people to essentially live free.  Maybe he'll combine all his skills into a traveling medical practice going around the country curing people of their Statist ills.

I had always been impressed by the fact that there are a surprising number of individuals who never use their minds if they can avoid it, and an equal number who do use their minds, but in an amazingly stupid way. - Carl Jung, Man and His Symbols
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 312
Points 4,325
Chyd3nius replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 10:48 AM

He could come out from his closet and declare anarcho-capitalism to be better than Constitution.

-- --- English I not so well sorry I will. I'm not native speaker.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 424
Points 5,980
Em_ptySkin replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 10:53 AM

I think it means we are gonna see him even more on TV.  He'll sign a contract with Fox News and be a correspondant like Palin...

 

Let's just try and make sure that he gets in the White House.  Or convince Rand and him to run together as independents.  Rand could go for pres to avoid the legal ramifications of Ron already being a republican candidate.

Rand would be waaay more popular than Bachmann and every one would know it.

Eating Propaganda

What do you mean i don't care how your day was?!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,037
Points 17,975
John Ess replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 2:06 PM

Palin is a correspondent?  Sheesh.  Is that supposed to be good?

Ron is a little old and less naive to sign with Fox.  There is zero chance he is getting in the white house.  And I think he knows that.

 

And Rand is just terrible.  I would disown him if I were Ron Paul.  And adopt a non-neocon son. 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,008
Points 19,520
Eric080 replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 2:56 PM

CNN has been much more welcome to inviting him on their shows than Fox has.  Paul usually can get on Fox Business with ease, but the main shows (Greta, Hannity, O'Reilly) don't want anything to do with him in primetime.

 

It would be interesting to see him "come out of the closet" and all the Ron Paul "actually he's the only conservative in Congress!" types would go bananas and become delirious.  "But anarchy means no laws, that's why we have a Constitution!"  I can see it now! cheeky

 

If Paul did say he was an anarchist, two things would happen.  First, his following would feel backstabbed.  I'm sure he could convince a number of his legion to become anti-statists, but the majority of people who revere the Constitution would disown Ron Paul.  Second, I think he would become even more marginalized than he is currently.  Nobody is going to let an avowed anarchist talk about topics on their show.  Ron Paul is seen by the majority as somewhat loony, but only a total loon would think there should be no state.  That would most likely cut off his access to the media.  The only anarchist that is somewhat relevant in the public eye today is Noam Chomsky, and even his influence is limited to far-left types who hate corporate-run media anyway.

"And it may be said with strict accuracy, that the taste a man may show for absolute government bears an exact ratio to the contempt he may profess for his countrymen." - de Tocqueville
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 8
Points 100

More time to join Jeffrey Tucker for burbon for breakfast!

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 173
Points 3,810
Brutus replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 3:24 PM

I think if he came into the White House, it'd be comparable to Dave Ramsey fixing the budget. President Paul would treat the U.S. economy like a sick patient by removing the disease and letting the body heal itself, not using band-aids like the Obama and the rest.

"Is life so dear or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" -Patrick Henry

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Male
Posts 63
Points 1,580
Raudsarw replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 3:29 PM

He becomes president instead.
 

Just trying to be optimistic.

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 76
Points 1,100
Amadeus replied on Thu, Jul 14 2011 4:17 PM

"And Rand is just terrible.  I would disown him if I were Ron Paul.  And adopt a non-neocon son. "

 

That's a bit far.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 645
Points 9,865
James replied on Sat, Jul 16 2011 4:25 AM

Who is going to succeed Paul on the GOP ticket in his own district?  That could be an interesting question.  Is the district which sent him to DC for so many years suddenly going to turn around and vote for a socialist or a neo-con just because Ron Paul is retired?

Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

He could move to NH with other liberty-minded people. We'd love having him here in the "live free or die" state.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

The district lines are being re-drawn.

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 645
Points 9,865
James replied on Sat, Jul 16 2011 5:02 AM

Lol, of course, how silly of me.

Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (15 items) | RSS