Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Libertarian 'occupiers' in New Hampshire arrested

rated by 0 users
This post has 106 Replies | 7 Followers

Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 461
Points 8,685

Well, there is a reason I said "pretty much." That is because I disagree with your interpretation. His want of survival skills is the only reason he has not left; but he still can engage in other activities before he learns these skills, and such engagements are not, per se, reasons for staying. They could simply be a means to pass time before his "wilderness mentor" is ready for his tutleage, and hence are not pertaining to the issue whatever. He is not merely hiding untold reasons for staying, in posting on these forums; for when he learns the necessary survival skills and is decked with proper accoutrements, he shall promptly leave if his word be true.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,051
Points 36,080
Bert replied on Fri, Oct 21 2011 10:13 PM

This forum =/= survivalist forum.  He may still be in "civ" before he's prepared (sounds pretty weak to me), but if he's preparing to live without "civ" he should actually be doing that instead of spending time on the internet, y'know, get use to living without "civ".  Doesn't sound like he's trying hard.

Which brings me to the question, what have you done to prepare?  Have you taught yourself how to gather food, build shelter, and so forth?  What survivalist skills are you currently working on?

I had always been impressed by the fact that there are a surprising number of individuals who never use their minds if they can avoid it, and an equal number who do use their minds, but in an amazingly stupid way. - Carl Jung, Man and His Symbols
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Fri, Oct 21 2011 10:35 PM

Is ANYONE going to discuss the video I posted of the arrests in NH?

No, because they don't matter! Occupy Wall Street was started by Soros to begin with but at least they have the gumption to mount a real protest in a real city. This is just a bunch of bored guys who haven't gotten laid in way too long picking a fight with the local cops and spending the night in jail. It's just like the guy I mentioned protesting parking tickets. What a waste of energy. Get a job and do something productive that benefits the rest of us. Instead, all I see these guys doing is increasing demand for police and court services, burdening the taxpayers further.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

 

Is ANYONE going to discuss the video I posted of the arrests in NH?

No, because they don't matter! Occupy Wall Street was started by Soros to begin with but at least they have the gumption to mount a real protest in a real city. This is just a bunch of bored guys who haven't gotten laid in way too long picking a fight with the local cops and spending the night in jail. It's just like the guy I mentioned protesting parking tickets. What a waste of energy. Get a job and do something productive that benefits the rest of us. Instead, all I see these guys doing is increasing demand for police and court services, burdening the taxpayers further.

Clayton -

i don't support the occupy protests but I do support liberty activists who were the people arrested in this case.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 312
Points 4,325
Chyd3nius replied on Sat, Oct 22 2011 8:12 AM

Whole Free Keene and "activism" in NH is waste of time and makes libertarians to looke like an idiots.

-- --- English I not so well sorry I will. I'm not native speaker.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,133
Points 20,435
Jargon replied on Sat, Oct 22 2011 9:28 AM

Freedom4Me73986:

 

Is ANYONE going to discuss the video I posted of the arrests in NH?

No, because they don't matter! Occupy Wall Street was started by Soros to begin with but at least they have the gumption to mount a real protest in a real city. This is just a bunch of bored guys who haven't gotten laid in way too long picking a fight with the local cops and spending the night in jail. It's just like the guy I mentioned protesting parking tickets. What a waste of energy. Get a job and do something productive that benefits the rest of us. Instead, all I see these guys doing is increasing demand for police and court services, burdening the taxpayers further.

Clayton -

i don't support the occupy protests but I do support liberty activists who were the people arrested in this case.

direct action gets satisfaction. the state has violated the nap. they should start from that.

Land & Liberty

The Anarch is to the Anarchist what the Monarch is to the Monarchist. -Ernst Jünger

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

Whole Free Keene and "activism" in NH is waste of time and makes libertarians to looke like an idiots.

The whole point of Free Keene is to draw attention to the useless laws and drug war. If enough of them get arrested the town of Keene will lose money and will consider taking the laws off the books. Also, the more Keeniacs in jail means less time the police in Keene will worry about people breaking other petty laws. It's a complex strategy known to work.

So what are you doing to advance liberty?

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,008
Points 16,185

Freedom4Me73986:

The whole point of Free Keene is to draw attention to the useless laws and drug war. If enough of them get arrested the town of Keene will lose money and will consider taking the laws off the books. .

How is 'more people in jail' a direct correlation or a causation to a  'reduction of local govrnment revenue' ?

My Blog: http://www.anarchico.net/

Production is 'anarchistic' - Ludwig von Mises

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

 

Freedom4Me73986:

The whole point of Free Keene is to draw attention to the useless laws and drug war. If enough of them get arrested the town of Keene will lose money and will consider taking the laws off the books. .

How is 'more people in jail' a direct correlation or a causation to a  'reduction of local govrnment revenue' ?

More people in jail equals more money the town has to spend. This means they'll either have to increase taxes or take the laws off the books in order to get that money back. Since most people in Keene are already fed up w/ high property tax (Keene has some of the highest in the state) they'll demand that the laws be done away with. It's all about public opinion. Seeing someone get arrested for having a beer on state property makes the town question the laws.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,008
Points 16,185

But if you look at the books of most towns in NH, most have increased their budget each year.

My Blog: http://www.anarchico.net/

Production is 'anarchistic' - Ludwig von Mises

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

But if you look at the books of most towns in NH, most have increased their budget each year.

Lie. Free staters managed to cut NH's budget by 12% last year.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,008
Points 16,185

really?(and I am talking about local government budgets not state)

http://www.city.laconia.nh.us/uploads/administration_dept/docs/Budget/BUDGET%20FY2012.pdf

public service salaries up, budget up, revenues by taxes up, revenue by non-taxes up, public service costs up...

more examples:

http://www.cityofportsmouth.com/finance/fy11adoptedbudget.pdf

http://www.graftoncountynh.us/Budgets/FY2010%20Budget%20Complete.pdf

 

My Blog: http://www.anarchico.net/

Production is 'anarchistic' - Ludwig von Mises

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Sat, Oct 22 2011 1:20 PM

@F4M: You need to read up on public choice theory. When the costs are spread over all citizens (taxes, cost of paying police to clear people drinking publicly out of the park) while the benefits accrue to a small minority (those prohibitionists who feel strongly about drinking in public), and you have a well-oiled redistributionary apparatus (local, state, federal gov't, etc.) the minority will be able to - and, therefore, will - impose the costs of implementing its programs onto the general public.

The reason is simple... it costs me, what, an additional penny in taxes? I'm going to waste even one minute of my day to eliminate that penny? Of course not. But if you hate drinking with a passion and hate to see people drinking in the public square almost enough to use your own money to prevent it, you'll gladly devote your energy lobbying and promoting until a law is passed that costs people an extra penny or two in order to keep public drinking prohibited. Hence, the incentive to lobby for laws prohibiting public drinking vastly exceed the incentive to lobby against the costs of such laws.

This is true of each initiative taken in isolation but the inevitable consequence is an explosion in the tax burden and the nanny state. Your protests hinge on the idea of taking that one or two pennies and turning it into three or four pennies. The public is still going to say "so what?" and I say not only are you wasting your time but you are in fact doing a disservice to your fellow man. We'd be better off if you were at least delivering pizzas or something.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

 

@F4M: You need to read up on public choice theory. When the costs are spread over all citizens (taxes, cost of paying police to clear people drinking publicly out of the park) while the benefits accrue to a small minority (those prohibitionists who feel strongly about drinking in public), and you have a well-oiled redistributionary apparatus (local, state, federal gov't, etc.) the minority will be able to - and, therefore, will - impose the costs of implementing its programs onto the general public.

The reason is simple... it costs me, what, an additional penny in taxes? I'm going to waste even one minute of my day to eliminate that penny? Of course not. But if you hate drinking with a passion and hate to see people drinking in the public square almost enough to use your own money to prevent it, you'll gladly devote your energy lobbying and promoting until a law is passed that costs people an extra penny or two in order to keep public drinking prohibited. Hence, the incentive to lobby for laws prohibiting public drinking vastly exceed the incentive to lobby against the costs of such laws.

This is true of each initiative taken in isolation but the inevitable consequence is an explosion in the tax burden and the nanny state. Your protests hinge on the idea of taking that one or two pennies and turning it into three or four pennies. The public is still going to say "so what?" and I say not only are you wasting your time but you are in fact doing a disservice to your fellow man. We'd be better off if you were at least delivering pizzas or something.

FYI it's not just about taxes and draining the state but about drawing attention to the laws and the fact that innocent people are being put in cages for absolutely nothing. Public attention to these laws is the first step.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

 

really?(and I am talking about local government budgets not state)

http://www.city.laconia.nh.us/uploads/administration_dept/docs/Budget/BUDGET%20FY2012.pdf

public service salaries up, budget up, revenues by taxes up, revenue by non-taxes up, public service costs up...

more examples:

http://www.cityofportsmouth.com/finance/fy11adoptedbudget.pdf

http://www.graftoncountynh.us/Budgets/FY2010%20Budget%20Complete.pdf

OK. So why are you so against the FSP? Why not support others who are working towards liberty?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,008
Points 16,185

Freedom4Me73986:

OK. So why are you so against the FSP? Why not support others who are working towards liberty?

I have noticed that when debates aren't going your way, you love to change the subject.

My Blog: http://www.anarchico.net/

Production is 'anarchistic' - Ludwig von Mises

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Sat, Oct 22 2011 1:42 PM

FYI it's not just about taxes and draining the state but about drawing attention to the laws and the fact that innocent people are being put in cages for absolutely nothing. Public attention to these laws is the first step.

Good luck with that. This is Amerika, home to 5% of the world's population and 25% of the world's prisoners. Like anybody's going to care if a few more preachy, smartass libertarians get thrown in jail for knowingly breaking the law.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

 

FYI it's not just about taxes and draining the state but about drawing attention to the laws and the fact that innocent people are being put in cages for absolutely nothing. Public attention to these laws is the first step.

Good luck with that. This is Amerika, home to 5% of the world's population and 25% of the world's prisoners. Like anybody's going to care if a few more preachy, smartass libertarians get thrown in jail for knowingly breaking the law.

 

 

You should tell all of this to the Keeniacs, not me.

http://freekeene.com/

Go ahead and join in their debate. Tell them why there wrong.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

@Izzy. I hope this changes your mind.

http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=24369.0

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

New video.

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Sat, Oct 22 2011 3:29 PM

What a joke. The local resident is right... he and his neighbors definitely have an easement on peace & quiet during night-time hours and these fools are violating their property rights... that's not protesting the government, that's protesting peaceful, property-rights-respecting society.

The more I look at it, the more anti-libertarian FSP looks to me.

Clayton -

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

The more I look at it, the more anti-libertarian FSP looks to me.

NH was selected as the destination for the FSP b/c it was already a strongly libertarian state. Even if NH has the same problems as everywhere else in America it's far better in every other respect except property tax. The FSP only has 960 people in NH as it is. Give it time. Once it grows to 2000 you'll start to see huge changes in NH. Even w/ only 960 progress towards a voluntary society is being made. You need to dig deeper and you'll find videos of free market activism in NH where police aren't present at all.

Think of it like this: if you knew that the state was going to rob you, would you rather be robbed by a completely tyrannical state or a less tyrannical state? Police in Manchester and Keene suck but the violent monopolies are much worse in California and New York.  I'd rather be extorted by the state in NH than in any other state.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

Also I should mention the other goal of Free Keene is to expose the violent nature of the state along with the victimless crime laws.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,987
Points 89,490
Wheylous replied on Sat, Oct 22 2011 11:50 PM

I have to side with Clayton and the local resident. Libertarians can make their points during daylight hours. No point being annoying during the night. It's not helping your cause.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

 Libertarians can make their points during daylight hours. No point being annoying during the night. It's not helping your cause.

They do.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX50QTu6yu0

Most of the liberty activism in NH appears to be agorism.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,987
Points 89,490
Wheylous replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 12:00 AM

My bad. Exclusively during the day.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

I still think we should support the FSP and stop dividing the liberty movement.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Female
Posts 111
Points 2,310
Heather replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 12:41 AM

 

The debate on F4M motives has been hilarious. Especially because its been more of an in-depth discussion than the topic he posted about.   So dude, could you tell us again

 

Why are you here?

 

 

Edit: It's like having a discussion about someone, in front of them, as though they weren't there.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

Why are you here?

To discuss libertarian philosophy. Who am I talking with, a judge?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 461
Points 8,685

Just answer the damn question!!!

Why are you here?

Why are you here?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 461
Points 8,685

Edit: It's like having a discussion about someone, in front of them, as though they weren't there.

Right, that was a very enjoyable debate. >_>

Who do you think was right?

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,149
Points 23,875

Are you asking why I'm on this forum or why I'm still living in civ?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 461
Points 8,685

Dude, remember I was the guy speaking in your defence? (Not in the defence of your 'Prim' beliefs, however).

Relax mate. Just a little parody and sarcasm about JJ & others. =)

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,987
Points 89,490
Wheylous replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 7:50 AM

I still think we should support the FSP and stop dividing the liberty movement.

Those guys protesting at night should stop dividing the liberty movement.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 99
Points 3,540
aervew replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 8:16 AM

You are the one thats disgusting. you are sitting in nyour chair, complaining about activists, when people are actually out there, trying to achieve progress. And then you have the nerve to call them the losers and trouble makers? Its as if youre bitter about not achieving liberty that you give up on it, and criticize everyone who happens to actually want to make a difference. It is the pessimist conspiracist line of thought. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,987
Points 89,490
Wheylous replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 8:36 AM

Libertarianism is hurt by people like these. You look out of your window and you see someone yelling in the middle of the night - do you want to join their movement or hurl a shoe at them?

Libertarians need to make their movement more palatable by focusing on big government issues and teaching the NAP. From there, the rest of the change will follow.

You know what else libertarianism could justify (besides yelling at night)? Resisting cops if they try to enter your home - for any reason, even with a warrant. Of course, this would escalate to violence, and if you are good enough at staying out of the hands of cops, then possibly a gun fight with a fight with a cop getting hurt or killed. Heck, you could kill all the cops that come to your door. This would not fly well with the public. Indeed, it is a pretty stupid thing to do, not only because cops think they're doing the right thing by entering your house (they are likely not libertarian) but because the public reaction would be to say "look at those libertarian cop killers).

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 312
Points 4,325
Chyd3nius replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 9:48 AM

So what are you doing to advance liberty?

Studying libertarianism and trying to get people to realize that libertarianism isn't about young students smoking pot in NH but a serious political theory.

-- --- English I not so well sorry I will. I'm not native speaker.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,987
Points 89,490
Wheylous replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 10:21 AM

Studying libertarianism and trying to get people to realize that libertarianism isn't about young students smoking pot in NH but a serious political theory.

+1

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 11:06 AM

>>>>You know what else libertarianism could justify (besides yelling at night)? Resisting cops if they try to enter your home - for any reason, even with a warrant. Of course, this would escalate to violence, and if you are good enough at staying out of the hands of cops, then possibly a gun fight with a fight with a cop getting hurt or killed. Heck, you could kill all the cops that come to your door. This would not fly well with the public. Indeed, it is a pretty stupid thing to do, not only because cops think they're doing the right thing by entering your house (they are likely not libertarian) but because the public reaction would be to say "look at those libertarian cop killers).>>>>

this is exactly correct. No one benefits when you harm unwitting agents, and someone has to break the cycle of violence.

 

Break the cycle of violence. Educate the police about anarchocapitalism during your ride in the police car. Explain to them how dumbasses like chief wouldnt be in charge of them and they wouldnt have to put their lives on the line punishing victimless offenders.

Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,987
Points 89,490
Wheylous replied on Sun, Oct 23 2011 11:15 AM

Well, preferably you wouldn't be in the cop car to begin with... Plus, you then make anarcho-capitalism appear to be the philosophy of criminals

  • | Post Points: 20
Page 2 of 3 (107 items) < Previous 1 2 3 Next > | RSS