Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Fun Healthcare Chart

rated by 0 users
This post has 8 Replies | 3 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 274
Points 5,675
My Buddy Posted: Sat, Jul 7 2012 5:51 PM

When debating healthcare with progs, you have probably seen this chart before.

"EAT THAT!" Say the proud Progs, having soundly crushed you.

If you're like me, you've had to then slog through explaining that no, American healthcare as it presently is doesn't work. But then they say "But then you have no examples to fight back with! I win! (insert evil cackle of your choice here)!"

But then, after diligent searching, I found this:

http://www.clearpictureonline.com/1960-US%20State%20Health.html

which shows American healthcare costs in 1960 (after many of the enforced problems of 1910 and the 1940s, but before the big mandates and Medicare) to be estimated at $2,952 when adjusted for inflation. Since it's an estimation, let's round that up to $3,000.

If you add the 1960 American cost of healthcare to that chart, it actually turns out to be the third cheapest listed, behind only Japan, Spain, and Italy. When you factor in the fact that almost all of those countries on the chart are currently undergoing massive debt crisis (especially those three), have incredibly high costs of living, and have comparably small amounts of disposable income, it's pretty clear which is the more "civilized" system. Not to mention the fact that those countries also feature wait times, AND their healthcare is often paid for twice by first taxes to the government and then by private insurance to get decent quality.

If anyone is a good photoshopper, they could make an awesome image macro just by modifying the previous chart with the added information, ideally with a caption like "PROBLEM, PROGRESSIVES"

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

...or you could just point out that

"The US as a country spends more money on health care, ipso facto health care is more expensive in the US."

= non sequitur.

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 274
Points 5,675
My Buddy replied on Sat, Jul 7 2012 10:55 PM

Well yeah, but they rarely concede anything from having their logical falacies pointed out, and that doesn't have the bonus of beating them at their own game

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

I suppose.  If you want to make it more palatable just tell them how you were in the checkout line at the grocery store the other day...and would you believe it...your bill was more than the guy in front of you!!

They must be charging you higher prices!

 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,679
Points 45,110
gotlucky replied on Sat, Jul 7 2012 11:25 PM

Lmao.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,055
Points 41,895

I suppose.  If you want to make it more palatable just tell them how you were in the checkout line at the grocery store the other day...and would you believe it...your bill was more than the guy in front of you!!

They must be charging you higher prices!

After that you can tell them that Somalia is exactly on the bottom of the full country list for that stat just to make sure that at least one person dies from laughing so hard.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 372
Points 8,230

Thanks for this. Anyone know any good books on healthcare?

"Nutty as squirrel shit."
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 3,055
Points 41,895

The one I saw with Somalia at the bottom was World Health Report 2000.  I'm rooting for Aghanistan bumping to #1.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (9 items) | RSS