Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

We need universal healthcare in America.

rated by 0 users
This post has 50 Replies | 8 Followers

Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 2,095
kylio27 Posted: Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:02 PM

Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZmmf5VWxaU

Medication should be paid for all people. People with certain sicknesses (particularly old people) just cannot afford medication at such costs. It should be provided to them for free, and in order to do that, it all has to be covered under universal healthcare. Should we just let them die or get worse? 

Look at the places in the world with universal healthcare, they're consistently considered to have the best healthcare. 

  • | Post Points: 110
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:06 PM

kylio27:
Medication should be paid for all people.

By who? With what?

kylio27:
People with certain sicknesses (particularly old people) just cannot afford medication at such costs.

What entitles them to medication at any particular price? What entitles them to medication at all?

kylio27:
It should be provided to them for free, and in order to do that, it all has to be covered under universal healthcare

What do you mean by "for free"?

kylio27:
Should we just let them die or get worse?

What mean "we", paleface?

kylio27:
Look at the places in the world with universal healthcare, they're consistently considered to have the best healthcare.

By who? By what standard(s)?

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 50
Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 2,095
kylio27 replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:10 PM

So what you're saying is that you don't care if people just die because of the crazy cost of medication. It needs to be controlled, it's getting crazy and many can't even afford to keep themselves alive. The best way to help everyone is through universal healthcare. 

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:11 PM

What I'm saying is, answer my questions. Or are you afraid to?

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 496
Points 8,945

Autolykos  - you post 4 minutes after her.  The video is over 8 minutes long.  You arent going to watch the video and give socialism a chance?!  Maybe this hit TV show, "what would you do", proves socialism works?! 

we should live by john quinones standards.  He's a celebrity, he knows best.

Eat the apple, fuck the Corps. I don't work for you no more!
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:12 PM

I'm not going to watch the video while I'm at work.

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 496
Points 8,945

im playing.  just making fun.  she posted a vid from a reality TV show as proof of need socialized healthcare and she wants to be taken seriously.

Eat the apple, fuck the Corps. I don't work for you no more!
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 496
Points 8,945

kylio - he asked pretty reasonable questions.  Why dont you take a minute, think it through, and give them an answer.

Eat the apple, fuck the Corps. I don't work for you no more!
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 806
Points 12,855

kylio27:
Medication should be paid for all people. ... It should be provided to them for free, and in order to do that, it all has to be covered under universal healthcare. Should we just let them die or get worse? 

Very thorough- makes perfect sense. Food, water, and basic housing should be next.

 

If I had a cake and ate it, it can be concluded that I do not have it anymore. HHH

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,679
Points 45,110
gotlucky replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:27 PM

ThatOldGuy:

Very thorough- makes perfect sense. Food, water, and basic housing should be next.

Wow. Just wow. Really? I can't believe you would ever say such an absurd thing.

Oxygen should next.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 421
Points 7,165

Most here would contend that free markets would provide the lowest cost healthcare with the highest quality and greatest distribution. That is, it would be the most humane way to provide healthcare. I agree.

How are we wrong?

The only one worth following is the one who leads... not the one who pulls; for it is not the direction that condemns the puller, it is the rope that he holds.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

Wasn't he being sarcastic?

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 2,095
kylio27 replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:33 PM

You have no proof. Anyway, American healthcare is private and in a free market, and look how bad it is. 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

kylio27:

Watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZmmf5VWxaU

Medication should be paid for all people. People with certain sicknesses (particularly old people) just cannot afford medication at such costs. It should be provided to them for free, and in order to do that, it all has to be covered under universal healthcare. Should we just let them die or get worse? 

Look at the places in the world with universal healthcare, they're consistently considered to have the best healthcare. 

 

I will be the first one to point out that people donated money to the old lady so that she could buy her medication. Omigod!!!!!!!!111111eleven

These selfish, pro-capitalist, individualist, I-heart-free-market white people donated money without being forced to do so by the government!!!!!!!!!!

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:36 PM

kylio27:
You have no proof. Anyway, American healthcare is private and in a free market, and look how bad it is.

What definition of "private" are you using?

What definition of "free market" are you using?

Why are you so afraid to answer my other questions?

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
Male
Posts 806
Points 12,855

gotlucky:
Wow. Just wow. Really? I can't believe you would ever say such an absurd thing.

gotlucky, you really shouldn't say things like this when I'm leaning back in my chair- I almost fell off laughing.

If I had a cake and ate it, it can be concluded that I do not have it anymore. HHH

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,679
Points 45,110
gotlucky replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:38 PM

SkepticalMetal:

Wasn't he being sarcastic?

Hopefully as sarcastic as I was.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 2,095
kylio27 replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:40 PM

There's not enough nice people to help all those in need. 

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 421
Points 7,165

Most here (including myself) would argue that a free market, existing within a free society, would provide healthcare at the lowest prices with the highest quality and the greatest distribution. That is, the free market would be the most humane solution; it would be even better than all those other countries' universal plans. How do you disagree?

The only one worth following is the one who leads... not the one who pulls; for it is not the direction that condemns the puller, it is the rope that he holds.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:43 PM

kylio27:
There's not enough nice people to help all those in need.

What obligates those "in need" to any particular "help"?

(You didn't think ignoring me would make me go away, did you?)

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 421
Points 7,165

My apologies for the double post.

Nice is a very subjective quality. Luckily, the free market doesn't require "niceness" to provide low prices, high quality, and great distribution. In fact, it is the competition that Brits about those things.

The only one worth following is the one who leads... not the one who pulls; for it is not the direction that condemns the puller, it is the rope that he holds.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 2,095
kylio27 replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:45 PM

It's called being a good human being to your fellow human being. You should understand this. In order to provide the most help for the most people, universal healthcare would be necessary, as it is UNIVERSAL. 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 496
Points 8,945

is it a good human to force everyone to follow your opinions at the point of a gun?

Eat the apple, fuck the Corps. I don't work for you no more!
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:49 PM

Troll:
It's called being a good human being to your fellow human being. You should understand this.

I, for one, have next to no idea what in the world you think "being a good human being to your fellow human being" means. And apparently you're too cowardly to explain that to us.

Troll:
In order to provide the most help for the most people, universal healthcare would be necessary, as it is UNIVERSAL.

I'll ask you again: what entitles anyone to any particular healthcare? The more you ignore this, the more cowardly and intellectually dishonest you appear.

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

Yeah, there's not enough nice people. Therefore, the government has to go all 1984 on us and have Jack Bauer break into your home since you didn't pay your taxes which contribute to a centralized health care system which allows no incentive for innovation.

  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 2,095
kylio27 replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:54 PM

If you want to use shit, you need to pay the taxes. I know you guys hate taxes, but if you want the services like healthcare, and infrastructure, you need to pay up. If you just want to freeload then you should be forced to pay the consequences. You just exploit people from their rights to health. 

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590
Autolykos replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:56 PM

Troll:
If you want to use shit, you need to pay the taxes. I know you guys hate taxes, but if you want the services like healthcare, and infrastructure, you need to pay up. If you just want to freeload then you should be forced to pay the consequences. You just exploit people from their rights to health.

At least now you're explicit about believing that people have a right to health. So where do you think this alleged right to health comes from?

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,258
Points 34,610
Anenome replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:56 PM

The needs of people were taken care of historically by voluntary cooperation.

All universal healthcare would be is compulsory cooperation, and therfore coercion, and therefore ethically insupportable.

Just because we don't compulse others to care for others doesn't mean they won't do so on their own. The very emotional empathy for people in need that the OP displays, and tries to appeal to in readers is the very empathy that will voluntarily lead to private charitable organizations and groups taking care of these people in need.

 

Autarchy: rule of the self by the self; the act of self ruling.
  • | Post Points: 5
Not Ranked
Posts 31
Points 2,095
kylio27 replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 2:59 PM

It's called natural rights. 

  • | Post Points: 65
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 421
Points 7,165

If you want to use shit, you need to pay the taxes. I know you guys hate taxes, but if you want the services like healthcare, and infrastructure, you need to pay up. If you just want to freeload then you should be forced to pay the consequences.

I think you just inadvertently destroyed your argument here. Replace "taxes" with "prices." And the only differences between paying taxes to the government and payings prices to a business is that the former is mandatory and lacks any incentive to reduce costs, increase quality, or increase distribution/availability.

Thanks for defeating your own argument!

The only one worth following is the one who leads... not the one who pulls; for it is not the direction that condemns the puller, it is the rope that he holds.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 421
Points 7,165

There is no right to health, not even from what's referred to as natural rights. You're just a)making thigs up or b)repeating things you've heard elsewhere.

The only one worth following is the one who leads... not the one who pulls; for it is not the direction that condemns the puller, it is the rope that he holds.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 429
Points 7,400

sincerely hope anyone in a convo with kylio27 realizes he/she is probably one of the most obvious trolls I've ever seen. Did you watch the video? Lol, it's hilarious - could actually be used to make a good case for private charity, honestly.

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 274
Points 5,675
My Buddy replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 3:10 PM

>If you want to use shit, you need to pay the taxes. I know you guys hate taxes, but if you want the services like healthcare, and infrastructure, you need to pay up. If you just want to freeload then you should be forced to pay the consequences. You just exploit people from their rights to health.

wut

Okay, well for one thing, that's a big assumption you just made Comrade. Healthcare and infrastructure MUST be paid for by taxes? Why?

Allow me to substitute:

>Comrades, you must pay your taxes for us to be capable of creating the food that sustains the Motherland! If you didn't pay your taxes, we wouldn't be able to make food and everyone would starve.

See what I did there?

What's "freeloading"? You've lept straight past the "is the government the best/only source of healthcare" argument as if we've already agreed on that, which we haven't. If they government ISN'T providing healthcare, then the only "freeloaders" are people which are voluntarily paid for by charity or non-paid 3rd parties, and they aren't freeloaders as those people gave up the money voluntarily.

Exploiting people for their "right" to health? What kind of retarded statement is that? Does the baker "exploit" the people he sells his bread to? Why, he EXPLOITS the food requirements of his fellow man and gouges them knowing that they need bread to survive! Baker's are parasitic leeches and should be hanged when the DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLE ARRIVES!

No.

Oh, and I've noticed you seem to have a Genghis Khan approach to making threads. You make a trollish thread in which you refuse to provide sources and claim "its obvious" whenever attacked, and then once you're under sufficient pressure you make a break for it and make a completely different trollish thread. Stop pussying out and stick to a thread, or at least make an acknowledgement of your abandonment when you give up.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 113
Points 1,685
RagnarD replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 3:16 PM

How about YOU and those that think like you pay for healthcare for yourselves, and exclude all of us mean greedy people  from your coverage?  No gun (pay for it or we'll kill you) necessary.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 496
Points 8,945

what she needs to do is answer autolykos simple questions so we can go from there.

if an apple a day keeps the doctor away then should we have free apples too?  if football raises the probability of needing a doctor by 5% should we ban football?    If not then universal healthcare shouldnt cover preventative healthcare?  if you cant have preventative healthcare then what healthcare ISNT preventative?  If you are still alive then all healthcare is preventative.  

if a million $$$ pill is .09% better than a $1.00 pill should we provide the million dollar pill because its better?  who makes those decisions?  if you a million dollar procedure only has a .0000000001% of working do you do it?  if you have 1 million AIDS infected people and only enough meds for 100 of them then who gets the meds?  

Since you are obviously understand what it means to be a human being over everyone else please explain.  

Eat the apple, fuck the Corps. I don't work for you no more!
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

kylio27:

K.  Now you watch this:

 

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 5,118
Points 87,310
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
SystemAdministrator

I have banned kylio27 for making insults.

 

To paraphrase Marc Faber: We're all doomed, but that doesn't mean that we can't make money in the process.
Rabbi Lapin: "Let's make bricks!"
Stephan Kinsella: "Say you and I both want to make a German chocolate cake."

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
Male
Posts 6,885
Points 121,845
Clayton replied on Thu, Sep 20 2012 3:51 PM

Please graveyard this thread.

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
Posts 6,953
Points 118,135

Daniel Muffinburg:
I have banned kylio27 for making insults.

Dammit i knew that was coming.  Did you have to delete the related posts though?  Couldn't you just like, blank out the word?  We lose the continuity in the forum when entire posts are deleted.  sad

 

On a related note, I do find it pretty funny how someone comes here specifically to troll us and he ends up being the one losing his cool and resorting to insults.  You're welcome any time, kylios of the world!

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

Shhh, don't be so loud. I've noticed that recently there have been a lot of spammers on the site making topics advertising some sports event.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 2 (51 items) 1 2 Next > | RSS