Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Let's play a game.

rated by 0 users
This post has 52 Replies | 4 Followers

Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 8:09 PM
Yes its voluntary. Owing to the fact that ownership is a social relation, the only way for you to find out is to ask the right people.
Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,850
Points 85,810

'"Time to define your terms Luminar."

No no! I want to watch him walk into the "well owning property is voluntary therefore paying the tax for it is therefore voluntary or apart of that voluntary action, therefore taxation is voluntary"

'Men do not change, they unmask themselves' - Germaine de Stael

 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 126
Points 3,080
Luminar replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 8:14 PM

Is there a term that you do not understand?  I thought the questions were easy enough.

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,018
Points 17,760

Voluntary- Agreement between 2 parties; no coercion involved. As such, if the government lays a tax on me, and i do not agree to it, it is not voluntary.

Ownership- You can manipulate the piece of property, and deny others from manipulating it.

Owning a piece of property is voluntary.

You can 1. Buy from someone else

               2. Discover a piece of land and employ your work to maintain and claim it.

Paying a tax is not voluntary for it supposes that the government has a right to take a piece of property that which you rightfully claimed.

If paying the tax was voluntary, it would not be called a tax. It would be merely a contractual agreement between 2 parties to pay an x aggreeable sum.

Tell me this.

If the government has every right to tax someone, how do we know that the government owns this piece of land? Is government property legitimate?

 

“Since people are concerned that ‘X’ will not be provided, ‘X’ will naturally be provided by those who are concerned by its absence."
"The sweetest of minds can harbor the harshest of men.”

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.org

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,288
Points 22,350

Using undefined terms is the key tactic of the Socratic trap.  What do you mean by ownership?

The Voluntaryist Reader: http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com/ Libertarian forums that actually work: http://voluntaryism.freeforums.org/index.php
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 8:17 PM
"voluntary" can mean several things.
Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 550
Points 8,575

Ownership of real estate just is. Of course, since the owner... owns it, that owner has the liberty to also relinquish his claim. The owner must also make some active effort to maintain his claim. You can use those two conditions to say that the owner chooses to hold the real estate, but the word voluntary doesn't really make sense.

You can verify an owner's claim by observing or consulting the appropriate parties.

"People kill each other for prophetic certainties, hardly for falsifiable hypotheses." - Peter Berger
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,258
Points 34,610
Anenome replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 8:56 PM

Aristippus:

What is required before you owe property tax?

An institution of aggression.

Checkmate, lmao ^_^

Autarchy: rule of the self by the self; the act of self ruling.
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 126
Points 3,080
Luminar replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 10:42 PM

Thanks for helping me deal with some smartass statists (even if you weren't aware you were).

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,018
Points 17,760

So we arent playing the game anymore?

What are you trying to say?

 

Ohhhhh, you had a statist ask you these kinds of questions right? Nd you fell into the trap?

 

“Since people are concerned that ‘X’ will not be provided, ‘X’ will naturally be provided by those who are concerned by its absence."
"The sweetest of minds can harbor the harshest of men.”

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.org

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 150 Contributor
Male
Posts 550
Points 8,575

Clearly, the only solution is not to play.

How about a nice game of chess?

"People kill each other for prophetic certainties, hardly for falsifiable hypotheses." - Peter Berger
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,288
Points 22,350

Want to continue the fun and games, Luminar? http://mises.org/community/forums/t/31805.aspx

The Voluntaryist Reader: http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com/ Libertarian forums that actually work: http://voluntaryism.freeforums.org/index.php
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 126
Points 3,080
Luminar replied on Fri, Oct 5 2012 9:33 AM

Ohhhhh, you had a statist ask you these kinds of questions right? Nd you fell into the trap?

Yeah, the best reply was the "institution of aggression."

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 2 of 2 (53 items) < Previous 1 2 | RSS