Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

What does it mean when people say the federal reserve is a "private" bank?

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 4 Followers

Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,018
Points 17,760
Kelvin Silva Posted: Fri, Oct 12 2012 5:24 PM

Doesnt the government appoint the chairman of fed. reserve?

Arent there tender laws forcing us citizens to ur FRB notes?

“Since people are concerned that ‘X’ will not be provided, ‘X’ will naturally be provided by those who are concerned by its absence."
"The sweetest of minds can harbor the harshest of men.”

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.org

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Fri, Oct 12 2012 5:30 PM
The ownership is privately held. Legal tender laws make US Dollars legal for settling all debts, the fed is just the sole remaining contractor who issues banknotes for the US. ;-)
Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,018
Points 17,760

I see wat u did dere.

So in reality, if we got rid of legal tender laws and let anyone use their own type of currency, it would be just as good as abolishing the fed?

The legal tender law gives the fed its monopoly status?

“Since people are concerned that ‘X’ will not be provided, ‘X’ will naturally be provided by those who are concerned by its absence."
"The sweetest of minds can harbor the harshest of men.”

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.org

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Fri, Oct 12 2012 5:44 PM
Thats correct. A free market in money would solve a lot of things.

edited to add: I may have misled you a bit, because the fed does create electronic dollars. I think congress has the power over money and they delegated it to the "private" federal reserve bank. Also note that the fed itself equivocates on its public/private status, sometimes in the same trial. "for the purposes of X statute, the federal reserve is private. For the purposes of Y statute, the federal reserve is public."

Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 372
Points 8,230

It means them evil banksters be controlling our gubmint, so its not really our gubmint's fault.

"Nutty as squirrel shit."
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

Officially, the Fed is private.

But when you look at it...how on earth could it be? How is that monopoly maintained? Oh yeah, because it's private status is only for show.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS