Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Libertarianism in Honduras

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 5 Replies | 2 Followers

Not Ranked
26 Posts
Points 510
John C posted on Sun, Dec 23 2012 5:42 PM

Private city in Honduras will have minimal taxes, government

By / Published September 22, 2012


Small government and free-market capitalism are about to get put to the test in Honduras, where the government has agreed to let an investment group build an experimental city with no taxes on income, capital gains or sales.

Proponents say the tiny, as-yet unnamed town will become a Central American beacon of job creation and investment, by combining secure property rights with minimal government interference. 

“Once we provide a sound legal system within which to do business, the whole job creation machine – the miracle of capitalism – will get going,” Michael Strong,  CEO of the MKG Group, which will build the city and set its laws, told

Strong said that the agreement with the Honduran government states that the only tax will be on property.

“Our goal is to be the most economically free entity on Earth,” Strong said.

Honduran leaders hope that the city will lead to an economic boom for the poverty-stricken country south of Mexico. The average income in Honduras is $4,400 a year.

“[It] will bring a lot of investment into the country [and be] a center for many employment opportunities for our people,” Honduran President Porfirio Lobo Sosa has said.

The laws in the city will be separate from those in the rest of Honduras. Strong said that the default law that will be enforced in the city will actually be based on Texas state law, which has relatively few regulations.

“It will be Texas law with more freedom of contract. Texas scores well on state economic freedom rankings,” he explained.

“Texas law is also very familiar to American business people, and it is very familiar to Hondurans, because a lot of Hondurans have gone there or have family there.”

Investors who think the city will do well will also be able to buy land there.

“There will be a free market in land,” Strong said.

The rules for immigrating to the city have yet to be finalized, but are expected to be loose.

“It will be designed to be very welcoming to those with a minimum threshold of skills or capital,” Strong said. However, businesses in the city will be required to employ a minimum proportion of native Hondurans – a requirement imposed at the outset by the Honduran government to ensure that the city’s benefits largely go to Hondurans.

To insure the city against political change, the Honduran Legislature has agreed that a two-thirds majority will be required to interfere with the city.

MKG will invest $15 million to begin building basic infrastructure for the first model city near Puerto Castilla on the Caribbean coast, said Juan Hernandez, president of the Honduran Congress. That first city would create 5,000 jobs over the next six months and up to 200,000 jobs in the future, Hernandez said.

Strong said construction could begin in months.

“First, we will build the critical infrastructure -- roads, water, power, sewers," Strong said. "In collaboration with the [Honduran] government, we will then create the city’s government system and the security, and 3 to 6 months after that we will build the first factories.”

The MKG Group city is the first to get approval, but Honduras plans to create other “free cities” as well.

The bill to allow the creation of such cities passed the Honduran Legislature nearly unanimously, by a vote of 126 to 1. But not everyone is on board with the project. Left-wing Hondurans have filed a complaint before the Honduran Supreme Court, arguing that the free cities project violates their constitution and treats “national territory as a commodity.”

The indigenous Garifuna people in Honduras also have protested the creation of free cities, saying that they are worried the cities will be built on their land.

Strong said that they need not worry.

“The media reports are full of inaccuracies. We're not even remotely close to [the Garifuna]. We're literally hundreds of miles away,” he said.

Additionally, the new city will be built on unoccupied land.

“We will be selecting unoccupied land so that everyone will be opting in by choice,” Strong said.

But some oppose the project being built anywhere in Honduras.

“I can't help but suspect that the promise of plenty of jobs is nothing but a Trojan horse,” Teofilo Colon Jr., who runs the Garifuna cultural group Being Garifuna, told

“The prospect of setting up a charter city, with its own laws, [that] is sovereign to itself and doesn't have to pay taxes, is a dubious one at best. It'd be tantamount to inviting pirates to come in and have free reign to essentially raid the country's resources/riches.”

The MKG Group says its plan, however, is not to take advantage of natural resources, but rather to attract entrepreneurs using good laws and low taxes.

Strong cited Hong Kong as a city that prospered under that model.

“Hong Kong’s poverty once was roughly on the level of Africa. Today it is one of the wealthiest places.”

Strong says that the same could happen in Honduras.

“We'll see Hondurans having more jobs, higher income, and more security than they've ever had.”


  • | Post Points: 35

All Replies

Top 50 Contributor
2,258 Posts
Points 34,610

This project is already dead; the Honduran supreme court ruled it a violation of their sovereignty and blocked it.

Autarchy: rule of the self by the self; the act of self ruling.
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
1,687 Posts
Points 22,990
Bogart replied on Wed, Dec 26 2012 12:29 PM

The highest court in Honduras agreed with the incredible envy of the mob of people against this proposal and said that it was unconstitutional.  You see it is against any constitution for a government that supposedly owns property to sell it to a private party for the uses of the private party without having to pay in bribes the amount of money it takes to make you equal to the mob.

The problem of this project is that no govenrment, especially a democratic one, will ever let a Hong Kong style place exist in their territory.  The government of China was reasonably intelligent in letting Hong Kong stay mostly the way it was pre-1997, but that is incredibly rare.  In a democracy it is completly impossible as a mob will show up and instead of changing their situation to mimick Hong Kong they will use government violence to force the situation the other way.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
429 Posts
Points 7,400

What a shame - this sounded pretty awesome.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
1,687 Posts
Points 22,990
Bogart replied on Wed, Dec 26 2012 1:45 PM

I agree.  But envy is a powerful and a destructive emotion.  The people against this proposal have gained nothing as far as I can tell.  Many of the folks in Mainland China hate the people in Hong Kong?  Obama and his ilk (Republicans Included) hate successful people who earn their property legitimately and will do stupind things like pass wealth destroying taxes that come with less revenue collected not more, just to satisfy their envy.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
2,258 Posts
Points 34,610
Anenome replied on Thu, Dec 27 2012 12:20 AM

I disagree that its blocking had much to do with envy of the mob.

This was purely about dissonance with the elite of the country. They could not stomach setting a precedent of internal autonomy, and feared their long-term positions if such a free-territory became so successful that it would be impossible to control.

They were more afraid of letting live the lizard that might grow into a dragon and devour them. As, indeed, it had a very great chance of doing.

China will be destabilized yet by their attempted integration of individualized Hong Kong with communist central control. It was a fine poison-pill the Brits dealt them, and we shall see that flower bloom in our lifetime I think, though to the Chinese elites it will prove more thorn than rose.

This isn't the first time something like this has happened either. There was an attempt to setup a semi-autonomous region in Madagascar, which was overruled by the political opponents of the current ruler whom used it as a political issue to hammer the existing ruler and hurt him so badly that he was forced to abandon supporting the project. They painted it as a foreign takeover and him complicit in virtually a western plot or something.

Autarchy: rule of the self by the self; the act of self ruling.
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS