Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

6 ways companies are secretly screwing job applicants

This post has 15 Replies | 7 Followers

Top 500 Contributor
Posts 228
Points 3,640
Blargg replied on Tue, Mar 19 2013 3:09 PM

Wahhhh, we deserve jobs, you have to interview us the way we want it, you're so awful even though you're the only buyers of our labor, wahhhh!

  • | Post Points: 50
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 372
Points 8,230

Blargg:
Wahhhh, we deserve jobs, you have to interview us the way we want it, you're so awful even though you're the only buyers of our labor, wahhhh!

You'd rather they receive their sustenance from sucking off the government's ****?

"Nutty as squirrel shit."
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 267
Points 5,370
Meistro replied on Tue, Mar 19 2013 3:19 PM

It should be tremendously easy to find a job - albeit not perhaps at the wage that most people feel they are entitled to - but the government, through burdensome regulations (some, such as the minimum wage, explicity prescribe unemployment, whereas others merely ensure that the marginal enterprises are not profitable) and high taxes has made it very difficult, especially for those who suffer from some abnormality, be it a disability, criminal record, lack of education, lack of employment history, abnormal appearance and also by encouraging the pauperization of society with welfare, compulsory unemployment insurance, etc.  Coupled this with ever increasing costs of living owing to the governments insatiable appetite for expanding the money supply and you have more and more people who are squeezed, and who, ironically, turn more and more to the politicians who are applying this pressure to them.  Of course if you are a healthy, normal, well adjusted, good looking individual from a good home you will probably never see this problem, and hardly be aware it exists - government policy targets, either purposely or by fortunate accident, marginalized groups - not the traditional minorities, such as ethnic groups or those of a certain sexual preference, but the groups I mentioned previously - creating a permanent underclass in order to fuel demand for the welfare bureaucracy and to ensure left wing 'pro people' political parties have support at the polls.  This fuels the counter culture revolution, and brings out support for right wing fasicist parties devoted to the police state, the military, the surveillance state and opposition to left wing political parties (in rhetoric only).

 

... just as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own - Albert Jay Nock

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 267
Points 5,370
Meistro replied on Tue, Mar 19 2013 3:19 PM

cracked, incidentally, while not libertarian is usually pretty well written

 

... just as the State has no money of its own, so it has no power of its own - Albert Jay Nock

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 305
Points 7,165

@BuzzKillington

Buncha greedy racist CORPORATIONS tryin 2 take away our RIGHT 2 WORK lolz

PEOPLE, not PROFITS amirite??

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 539
Points 11,275

Wahhhh, we deserve jobs, you have to interview us the way we want it, you're so awful even though you're the only buyers of our labor, wahhhh!

Just out of interest, do you have a trust fund?

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 372
Points 8,230

@BuzzKillington

Buncha greedy racist CORPORATIONS tryin 2 take away our RIGHT 2 WORK lolz

PEOPLE, not PROFITS amirite??

Race? I never brought race into the matter, and you'd never see me complain about such a thing.

"Nutty as squirrel shit."
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 372
Points 8,230

Read the article.

"Nutty as squirrel shit."
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 2,679
Points 45,110
gotlucky replied on Tue, Mar 19 2013 4:13 PM

Meistro:

cracked, incidentally, while not libertarian is usually pretty well written

They just had a halfway decent article on statistics today.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 228
Points 3,640
Blargg replied on Tue, Mar 19 2013 8:19 PM

Just out of interest, do you have a trust fund?

No, I've got about $250 in the bank, probably around $2k in possessions, and no job. I don't feel I'm entitled to a job from anyone, and know that whatever applicant selection process they use isn't out to screw me (as if I were so important that they'd take time out to make my life worse).

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,439
Points 44,650
Neodoxy replied on Tue, Mar 19 2013 8:54 PM

"You'd rather they receive their sustenance from sucking off the government's ****?"

Do you propose preventing this by having the government come in and "fix" the problem?

At last those coming came and they never looked back With blinding stars in their eyes but all they saw was black...
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 200 Contributor
Male
Posts 470
Points 7,025
Vitor replied on Tue, Mar 19 2013 9:26 PM

Heh, nobody is saying that goverment should fix how companies hire people, afterall goverment has the most stupid way of hiring, at least here in Brazil, there are the "concursos", if you are best in a "mark the rignt answer" test, you basically get a highly paid (much above market) job with little pressure for results and you are basically unfireable. 

Any company that would hire like that, saying "you were gooding chosing the right answer on a test, now you can be shitty that we won't fire you" would go under rather quickly. 

But yeah, there is a lot of bullshit when it comes to the hiring proccess in private companies, no doubt about that. And pointing that out doesn't make anyone a socialist, Dilbert's autor is a libertarian and points out a lot of dumb stuff done in business.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 372
Points 8,230

Do you propose preventing this by having the government come in and "fix" the problem

Why not?

"Nutty as squirrel shit."
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
Posts 183
Points 3,740

I think the companies that are using these methods are damaging themselves. Take the guy with 30 years of experience who can't get a job because of the software. If one company decides to notice him and pick him up it will be a great loss for their competitors.  

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 228
Points 3,640
Blargg replied on Thu, Mar 21 2013 10:24 AM

Are you assuming that there aren't people just as valuable who are not being eliminated by the software, and that it's no cost to the company to manually go through all the people the software does filter that wouldn't be valuable to them?

  • | Post Points: 5
Previous | Next
Page 1 of 1 (16 items) | RSS