It's also worth noting that increases in producing aren't necessarily natural or desirable. I think that in a free society production would probably remain more or less flat.
Oh lord
The Anarch is to the Anarchist what the Monarch is to the Monarchist. -Ernst Jünger
dude production means producing things that people want. satisfaction of wants is necessarily good, otherwise youre speaking gibberish. this is apodictically true.
To whom Nazi government were indebted?
No. It's definitionally true, if you happen accept your definition of the word 'production'. I'm guessing maybe No2statism has a slightly wider definition that includes production of tanks and atom bombs, and if so, I'd tend to agree with him that not all production is good.
"no"? do you know what apodictically true means? production of tanks and atom bombs is good for some people.
To clarify, I meant that increases in production increases under the leviathan State usually aren't good (due to the govt producing) and consumption isn't necessarily bad as long as it's not encouraged by the govt.
Yes, I do. Don't be so bloody patronising.
Firstly, 'good for some people' does not equate to 'desireable', which was his claim. Secondly, he does not state who it is undesireable for. Thirdly, "production means producing things that people want". No, production means producing things, full stop.
its patronising to suggest that I was wrong because I didnt use your preferred synonym. its not patronizing to call you out on your behavior.
Firstly, 'good for some people' does not equate to 'desireable', which was his claim.
desires are held by people. so it pretty much does. who is doing the desiring here?
Secondly, he does not state who it is undesireable for.
and this is addressed to me instead of him why?
Thirdly, "production means producing things that people want". No, production means producing things, full stop.
then all behavior is necessarily equally productive.