Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Does legal tender increase speculation?

rated by 0 users
Answered (Verified) This post has 3 verified answers | 7 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 100 Contributor
814 Posts
Points 16,290
No2statism posted on Fri, Apr 12 2013 7:58 AM

If we were taxed in a single commodity, then would speculation go down?  I'm not sure if Rothbard was trying to say that paper money was good for speculators and that speculation would go down if the govt couldn't createmoney.  If speculation is not reduced by government inability to create money, then why isn't it?

I would guess since commodities are limited, there would be less speculation in a world without monetary legislation but I'm not really sure so that's why I'm asking.

  • | Post Points: 20

Answered (Verified) Verified Answer

Top 10 Contributor
6,953 Posts
Points 118,135
Verified by No2statism

I'm curious as to why you care how much speculation there is.  It sounds as if you're of the opinion that there is some "ideal" amount of speculation in an economy.

 

  • | Post Points: 40
Top 10 Contributor
6,953 Posts
Points 118,135
Verified by No2statism

No2statism:
There isn't an ideal amount and I don't want government encouraging it nor do I want govt restricting it.  Speculation can encourage people to make more efficient use of resources, so it's not necessarily bad.  Speculation is good for people with low time preference.  Austrian economics says its impossible for there to be an ideal amount of speculation anyway.

I'm pretty sure that's what I was implying.

 

I had thought I read that people like Robert Morris didn't like hard money because it made speculation more difficult.

So, what, fiat money is superior?

 

  • | Post Points: 40
Top 10 Contributor
6,953 Posts
Points 118,135
Verified by No2statism

I don't mean to shut you down, I'm just not really sure what you're asking/getting at.  So some guy says hard money makes speculation more difficult.  So what?  What's his alternative?

As Thomas Sowell says, "Compared to what?"

Much like my point in the murder clinic thread, it's like arguing that you can't have freedom because if you have freedom people will die.

 

  • | Post Points: 40

All Replies

Top 100 Contributor
814 Posts
Points 16,290

Let me know if my OP wasn't clear.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 10 Contributor
6,953 Posts
Points 118,135
Verified by No2statism

I'm curious as to why you care how much speculation there is.  It sounds as if you're of the opinion that there is some "ideal" amount of speculation in an economy.

 

  • | Post Points: 40
Top 100 Contributor
814 Posts
Points 16,290

There isn't an ideal amount and I don't want government encouraging it nor do I want govt restricting it.  Speculation can encourage people to make more efficient use of resources, so it's not necessarily bad.  Speculation is good for people with low time preference.

Austrian economics says its impossible for there to be an ideal amount of speculation anyway.  The actions of the market make it impossible for prices to not fluctuate.

Is it the case that people like Robert Morris didn't like hard money because it made speculation more difficult?

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
6,953 Posts
Points 118,135
Verified by No2statism

No2statism:
There isn't an ideal amount and I don't want government encouraging it nor do I want govt restricting it.  Speculation can encourage people to make more efficient use of resources, so it's not necessarily bad.  Speculation is good for people with low time preference.  Austrian economics says its impossible for there to be an ideal amount of speculation anyway.

I'm pretty sure that's what I was implying.

 

I had thought I read that people like Robert Morris didn't like hard money because it made speculation more difficult.

So, what, fiat money is superior?

 

  • | Post Points: 40
Top 100 Contributor
814 Posts
Points 16,290

never mind.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 10 Contributor
6,953 Posts
Points 118,135
Verified by No2statism

I don't mean to shut you down, I'm just not really sure what you're asking/getting at.  So some guy says hard money makes speculation more difficult.  So what?  What's his alternative?

As Thomas Sowell says, "Compared to what?"

Much like my point in the murder clinic thread, it's like arguing that you can't have freedom because if you have freedom people will die.

 

  • | Post Points: 40
Top 100 Contributor
814 Posts
Points 16,290

I can see where it would be hard to understand what I was asking because I don't understand what I was asking.

Sorry about that and thank you for your replies.  I appreciate them.

And yes, people will die regardless of govt action.

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (8 items) | RSS