Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Keynesian-Austrian synthesis

rated by 0 users
Not Answered This post has 0 verified answers | 44 Replies | 6 Followers

Not Ranked
Male
78 Posts
Points 1,950
Daniel Kuehn posted on Wed, May 11 2011 9:58 AM

Does anyone know of any attempts at what might be called a "Keynesian-Austrian synthesis" other than Garrison's work? I've sketched something out recently that I want to try and make more formal and I'm curious what other work has been done - I haven't come across much. One concern I have with Garrison is that there are parts where he (1.) assumes full employment, and (2.) constrains his version of the Keynesian model to a loanable funds theory of the interest rate. Both essentially rob Keynesianism of its central point, of course!

I'm working on a pretty standard IS-LM framework that doesn't do what Garrison did, but which includes a capital structure as in Prices and Production. Has anything like this been done before that I ought to be aware of?

  • | Post Points: 110

All Replies

Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,687 Posts
Points 48,995

That a theory is praxeologically derived doesn't mean its incompatible with something that isn't praxeologically derived.  The conclusions he derives in Prices and Production, however, are praxeological in the sense that they aren't based on empirical observation.  It's a work of pure logic.

  • | Post Points: 20
Not Ranked
Male
78 Posts
Points 1,950

re: "That a theory is praxeologically derived doesn't mean its incompatible with something that isn't praxeologically derived."

Right.

re: "The conclusions he derives in Prices and Production, however, are praxeological in the sense that they aren't based on empirical observation.  It's a work of pure logic."

Hmmm. I'm not so sure about that. It's a theoretical work, to be sure. But it is not derived from premises about human action seeking satisfaction, so I'd hesitate to call it "praxeological". As you rightly say, of course, this doesn't mean that it's inconsistent with praxeological.

But basis in empirical observation seems to be a low bar for praxeology. If that's all that's required then Keynes's General Theory is praxeology too!

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
285 Posts
Points 4,140

Tagged.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,687 Posts
Points 48,995

But it is not derived from premises about human action seeking satisfaction, so I'd hesitate to call it "praxeological".

Maybe Hayek did not put as much emphasis on the axiom of human action as Mises did, but Hayek was a follower of Menger (who do you think influenced Mises?) and did practice "methodological individualism".  So, in that sense, Hayek's economics very much did revolve around rational, economizing man.  In Prices and Production Hayek isn't writing a treatise on economics, so it wouldn't make much sense to spend a lot of time on methodology and elucidating the exact deductive path Hayek took to reach his conclusions.  That doesn't mean there wasn't a method involved, and I think there is a lot of evidence in Hayek's prior writings (namely, Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle) and from looking at his influences (Mises and Menger).

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Male
1,008 Posts
Points 16,185

justinx0r:

Ludwig Lachmann called himself an 'Austro-Keynesian'  and his work has similarities to the Post-Keynesianism of today.

May you cite where he said/wrote that he was an austrokeynesian? I have read alot of Lachmann and I never heard him write such a thing.

My Blog: http://www.anarchico.net/

Production is 'anarchistic' - Ludwig von Mises

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 500 Contributor
Male
197 Posts
Points 3,520

I wish, it was in an article I read but can't remember where I found it. I've been trying to find it for a while.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
1,008 Posts
Points 16,185

One of my econ professors at UTD, Peter Lewin, was a student of Lachmann and he wrote several bios of Lachmann, and he does not acknowledge this 'austro-keynesian' label. (he actually wrote the Lachmann bio for the Mises Institute)

My Blog: http://www.anarchico.net/

Production is 'anarchistic' - Ludwig von Mises

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 500 Contributor
Male
197 Posts
Points 3,520

Well I'm sure I didn't imagine what I read. It had to do with his and Keynes disequilibrium analysis and subjective expectations. I'll spend some more time looking for it - I'll PM you if/when I find it.

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
3,260 Posts
Points 61,905
ForumsAdministrator
Moderator
Staff
SystemAdministrator

William posted this last week: Lachmann discussing the commonalities shared by the two schools, but he does not call himself an Austro-Keynesian therein.

"the obligation to justice is founded entirely on the interests of society, which require mutual abstinence from property" -David Hume
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,687 Posts
Points 48,995

Lachmann thought that Keynes took subjectivity to a far greater level than any Austrian.  He was deeply influenced by Shackle, and in that sense he had some "Keynesian" qualities.  However, he was an Austrian as far as market coordination went.

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,255 Posts
Points 36,010
Moderator

Lachmann goes on a bit about Popper, Keynes, and Austrianism briefly at the end of this lecture too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvhR9XVIVmc

somewhere around the 1:09 mark

Also Jonathan sent me an article by Lachmann about Mises and Shackle; Ihaven't really read it yet but, if anyone wants it PM me and I'll Email it to them.

"I am not an ego along with other egos, but the sole ego: I am unique. Hence my wants too are unique, and my deeds; in short, everything about me is unique" Max Stirner
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
1,288 Posts
Points 22,350

It may be helpful to see what Rothbard thought of Lachmann:

"I sound off at you on Lachmann because I’ve been appalled, since reading
some of the papers written by the [summer] fellows out here [at the
Institute for Humane Studies in Menlo Park, California] at the extent to
which Lachmannia has permeated their thinking. I am convinced that
Mises would have considered Lachmann (an institutionalist, nihilist, and
Keynesian) an “anti-economist,” and he would have been right. Lachmann
is not an Austrian at all. Back to Mises!"

The Voluntaryist Reader: http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com/ Libertarian forums that actually work: http://voluntaryism.freeforums.org/index.php
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Male
2,255 Posts
Points 36,010
Moderator

Meh whateves, that comment doesn't mean anything.  I can't comment much on the conclusions of Lachmann other than he seems very very interesting, and I think his work demands one take him very seriously, regardless of what conclusions I may agree or disagree with in the end.   He certainly does not deserve to be the focus of character assassination.  And he most certainly is an Austrian.

"I am not an ego along with other egos, but the sole ego: I am unique. Hence my wants too are unique, and my deeds; in short, everything about me is unique" Max Stirner
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 100 Contributor
836 Posts
Points 15,370

Mr Kuehn, as far as a neoclassical synthesis goes, especially on the micro level, you may want to get in touch with Paul A. Cleveland. He made the following lecture at the ASC this year.

 

Also, would your model utilise a representative agent(firm and consumer). I suspect you might find important characteristics such as Cantillon effects impossibly obscured by such an approach.

"When the King is far the people are happy."  Chinese proverb

For Alexander Zinoviev and the free market there is a shared delight:

"Where there are problems there is life."

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
1,389 Posts
Points 21,840
Moderator

To go again on the Lachmann / Shackle thing:

http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/search?q=lachmann

"As in a kaleidoscope, the constellation of forces operating in the system as a whole is ever changing." - Ludwig Lachmann

"When A Man Dies A World Goes Out of Existence"  - GLS Shackle

  • | Post Points: 5
Page 3 of 3 (45 items) < Previous 1 2 3 | RSS