Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

A couple of games to play.

rated by 0 users
This post has 18 Replies | 4 Followers

Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,288
Points 22,350
Aristippus Posted: Thu, Oct 4 2012 8:30 PM

Imagine John dug up some clay from the ground and made a pot out of it.  Then James took the pot.  John objected and James took out a gun and shot him in the face.

Imagine John dug up some clay from the ground and made a pot out of it.  Then Matthew took the pot.  Matthew sold the pot to James.  John objected and James took out a gun and shot him in the face.

Are James' actions in these scenarios just or unjust?

The Voluntaryist Reader: http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com/ Libertarian forums that actually work: http://voluntaryism.freeforums.org/index.php
  • | Post Points: 65
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,018
Points 17,760

Shooting someone in the face because of a mere pot is unjust.

They must go to private court to settle the matter, and to find restitution that is just for both parties.

Shooting the guy in the face is dealing more than what is needed.

Instead of this being an eye for an eye, this is an eye for the whole body and then some more

It is overly punishing.

Edit- Your scenarios are quite confusing.

“Since people are concerned that ‘X’ will not be provided, ‘X’ will naturally be provided by those who are concerned by its absence."
"The sweetest of minds can harbor the harshest of men.”

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.org

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,850
Points 85,810

Seriously, can I be a race car driver?

'Men do not change, they unmask themselves' - Germaine de Stael

 

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

@ Andrew Cain

wat

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,850
Points 85,810

@SkepticalMetal

Zoom Zoom!

'Men do not change, they unmask themselves' - Germaine de Stael

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,288
Points 22,350

You can be a tank driver or a fighter pilot.

The Voluntaryist Reader: http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com/ Libertarian forums that actually work: http://voluntaryism.freeforums.org/index.php
  • | Post Points: 35
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

@ Andrew Cain

I dun get it...ur makin my brain implo-

*Splat*

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,850
Points 85,810

"You can be a tank driver or a fighter pilot."

Then I win. 

'Men do not change, they unmask themselves' - Germaine de Stael

 

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 50 Contributor
Posts 1,711
Points 29,285

GODDAMMIT I STILL DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU PEOPLE ARE TALKING ABOUT

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,288
Points 22,350

Luminar doesn't want to play?

The Voluntaryist Reader: http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com/ Libertarian forums that actually work: http://voluntaryism.freeforums.org/index.php
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 203
Points 5,505
TronCat replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 9:07 PM

This James sounds like an asshole. Is he the same guy that steals bikes? 

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 9:21 PM
I call fighter pilot!
Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • | Post Points: 20
Top 25 Contributor
Posts 3,739
Points 60,635
Marko replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 9:22 PM

Shouldn't John be the one doing the shooting? If you want to have a debate at all?

  • | Post Points: 35
Top 75 Contributor
Male
Posts 1,018
Points 17,760

Hmm infact, after shooting, he could ressurect one, and torture the other?

I like rainbows.

 

It did say Imagine.

 

“Since people are concerned that ‘X’ will not be provided, ‘X’ will naturally be provided by those who are concerned by its absence."
"The sweetest of minds can harbor the harshest of men.”

http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.org

  • | Post Points: 5
Top 50 Contributor
Male
Posts 2,493
Points 39,355
Malachi replied on Thu, Oct 4 2012 9:25 PM
In my opinion James' is responsible for the debate not happening. I think if John was trying to debate he wouldnt shoot him. This is HHH stuff right
Keep the faith, Strannix. -Casey Ryback, Under Siege (Steven Seagal)
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,288
Points 22,350

Shouldn't John be the one doing the shooting? If you want to have a debate at all?

No, it's James.  I've seen people on this forum imply that James is in the right in this scenario so I'm wondering if they'll show themselves here.

The Voluntaryist Reader: http://voluntaryistreader.wordpress.com/ Libertarian forums that actually work: http://voluntaryism.freeforums.org/index.php
  • | Post Points: 5
Top 25 Contributor
Male
Posts 4,922
Points 79,590

Aristippus:
Imagine John dug up some clay from the ground and made a pot out of it.  Then James took the pot.  John objected and James took out a gun and shot him in the face.

Imagine John dug up some clay from the ground and made a pot out of it.  Then Matthew took the pot.  Matthew sold the pot to James.  John objected and James took out a gun and shot him in the face.

Are James' actions in these scenarios just or unjust?

I'd say his actions in both scenarios are unjust.

The keyboard is mightier than the gun.

Non parit potestas ipsius auctoritatem.

Voluntaryism Forum

  • | Post Points: 20
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 875
Points 14,180
xahrx replied on Fri, Oct 5 2012 9:56 AM

Depends on the pot, really.  If it's really nice, I could see how James would shoot someone over it.

"I was just in the bathroom getting ready to leave the house, if you must know, and a sudden wave of admiration for the cotton swab came over me." - Anonymous
  • | Post Points: 5
Page 1 of 1 (19 items) | RSS