Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Brandon Barrios

My Friends

No users have been added to Brandon Barrios's friends list.

My Files

Brandon Barrios has not uploaded any files.
39 years old
Washington D.C.
Male
2 Posts
10 Points

Shared Favorites

  • Brandon Barrios has not yet identified any favorite posts.
View all favorites

Shared Feeds

Brandon Barrios has not entered any shared feeds.

My Bio

Los Angeles native.  St. John Bosco High School.  Spanish Institute of Puebla. ESEI Business School Barcelona. California State University Fullerton, Mihaylo College of Business.  Business Administration Finance.  Campaign for Liberty National Office.

Announcements

  • Wed, Dec 16 2009
  • Conscience of a Political Economist: Paul Krugman

     

    The other night my friend and I attended economist Paul Krugman’s presentation on “Are We Getting the Change We Need?” at Baruch College.  I felt fortunate for having the opportunity to ask Mr. Krugman’s opinion on Congressman Paul’s legislation to audit the Federal Reserve.

    Krugman’s speech centered on public policies, such as bailouts, universal health care, government expansion and increased spending - all of which have been moderate proposals for his taste.   Krugman believes that Nancy Pelosi’s health care package is an incremental step toward driving out private insurance companies and ensuring a public option down the road.  Given his reputation as a Nobel Laureate economist, I waited for his explanation on how government sources of revenue – taxes, foreign borrowing and monetary expansion – would affect middle-and-lower class Americans, the demographic the health care plan ultimately aims to cover.  

    Krugman failed to explain how an overextended government and recessed economy would finance increased expansions without hurting small businesses, which employ more than half of all U.S. private sector jobs.   His vagueness made it strikingly evident that Krugman is an economic pitchman for the progressive agenda, rather than a neutral voice of economic reason.   One would think that the Noble Commission would assure economic sanity in its economic laureates, but alas, expanding military troops and denouncing peace as overly idealistic is deserving of a Peace Prize.   

    Following Krugman’s speech, people rushed to the microphones to ask questions but were turned away to allow for rhetorician, Dr. Donald Smith, past president of the National Alliance of Black School Educators to take to the podium.  Smith and Krugman share an intimate connection not just in rhetoric; Paul is married to Smith’s first cousin Robin Wells and supposed Federal Reserve economist.  How do I know that?  Mr. Smith for an extended period unconscionably introduced members of his extended family, professional and personal acquaintances as well as his real estate agent to the 300+ members in the audience waiting to question Krugman. 

    Most entertaining was Smith’s criticism of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who attributes the unprecedented wealth and employment gap faced by African-Americans to their financial illiteracy.  Smith, on the other hand, attributed it to confiscation of property rights, wealth robbed from generations of African-Americans and slavery.  If only he realized how much Austrians and Paulistas agree with him on property rights, entitlement to earned wealth and civil liberties, I’m positive we could collaborate on a project or two! 

    A Q&A session was finally opened and most were directed to Krugman about universal health care, how to educate tea baggers and the effects of increasing taxes on small businesses to provide revenue for government spending.  His answers were neutral and indirect, understandable due to his status as a leading economist for a failing school of economic thought - Keynesianism.  I directed my question first to Donald Smith and then to Krugman:

    “Donald Smith I support your words on the need for atonement, instead of destroying and rebuilding Iraq.  To Mr. Krugman, I particularly enjoyed your comment that government spends tons of money to keep people from having health care insurance, but what I’m most interested in is the spending (to which I was interrupted and prompted for a question).  We run trillions and trillions of dollars in deficits, whether it is spent on welfare, warfare or corporatism, it is financed by the Federal Reserve.  What is your opinion on Ron Paul’s H.R. 1207 to audit the Federal Reserve considering the most recent amendment specifically keeps Congress out of monetary policy?

    Mr. Krugman’s immediate response was that Fed actions are already largely audited.  I quickly emphasized that Federal Reserve Bank transactions with foreign central banks are not audited.  From that point Krugman shut down and derided that Ron Paul inevitably wants a return to the gold standard, which drew some chatter from the audience.  I returned the favor and asked that he focus on the subject of my question, the legislation, and not his personal opinion of Dr. Ron Paul but I was dismissed by the moderator and no further answer to my question was given. 

    My fellow Campaign for Liberty colleague did a marvelous job pressing for a debate between Mr. Krugman and an Austrian economist.

    She noted the current economic collapse, which was predicted by the Austrian School, is due to the failure of Keynesian economics, not free market capitalism.  She asked if he would be willing to engage in an academic debate with Austrian economists in order to have a more genuine debate on public policy.  He dismissed the Austrian school as passé and incapable of explaining unemployment and preventing the Great Depression. She again asked politely if he would debate one of the Austrians since they correctly predicted the housing bubble, subsequent collapse and is growing in popularity.  His answer was basically, "it sounds like intellectual snootiness...and it is...I have better things to do with my resources."  The following morning he spent his resources writing this on his NYT blog.

    My response can be found in the comments section #150.  It is unfortuate that leading academics of Dr. Krugman’s stature defame young aspiring intellectuals as disrespectful or loony for representing a legitimate school of thought that challenges his political ideology.

    Given that Krugman chooses to invest his limited resources in spreading slander rather than debating, is this the kind of decision maker we want driving public policy for millions of Americans?  It should be no wonder why millions of Americans are protesting policies advocated by leading intellectuals like Krugman.

    I propose we represent the need for honest intellectual debate between the Keynesian and Austrian School of Economic Thought.  The first step is to mobilize and join the following facebook group to represent this demand.  Coverage and updates on this exchange and the push for a debate will be listed here.

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=217592968856&ref=ts

     

My Comments

No one has commented on Brandon Barrios.