-
[quote user="Samarami"]That's because they cannot think of "anarchy" as a way of life .[/quote] ain't that the Truth. - peace and love
-
Since some people don't think love implies an ought, then yes of course some people will not possess the wisdom of what love implies.
-
That's what I thought you meant at first, which is why I "suggested" your post. Then Marko's response made me wonder if I read too much of my thoughts into your post and misread what you said. Glad you cleared it up and it appears that what I originally thought you had said is true. Good post z1235.
-
[quote user="z"]The "economic" justification for justice is the ultimate one.[/quote] I misread this. [quote user="Marko"]And who ever said having an economy was better than not having it? Justice justifies itself. It does not need to be "justified" by being good for the economy.[/quote] Good call Marko. Thanks
-
[quote user="wilderness"]Where in the bible does it say this? Quote?[/quote] [quote user="Esuric"]There are a lot of passages form the bibble that allegedly support this assertion, but they're extremely vague and require heavy analysis. Here are some quotes, though. Either way, this is the position held by the Dispensational
-
[quote user="Esuric"]The bible says that the world will end when the Jews return to the holy land (Israel) and when they rebuild Solomon’s temple (the Dome of the Rock, Islam's third holiest site, is currently on its location).[/quote] Where in the bible does it say this? Quote?
-
[quote user="JakobM"]This is no different than talking to a gestapo officer. "You must do what the führer says"[/quote] Now be polite to the gestapo officer. Remain intellectual and don't forget to be touchie, feelie as he talks about his gun, and whips it around and shows it to everybody on numerous occassions as he is
-
Nitro, Because my natural right is my life. That's as personal as anything in this world can ever be. Lilburne - Don't. That post of yours is wholly disrespectful at this point.
-
Lilburne, In my opinion, you only philosophically poison debates. I was using methodological individualism. But because you possess a semantic hang-up on the word "society", do not practice methodological individualism, and thereby have not been able to transform the concept into methodological individualism as I have been able to with intellectual
-
Who said this was about agreement? I never did. Respect ok. Honor yes. But for a person to actually question my existence because I don't need to be told over and over again by Lilburne that my existence is an error and is wrong. I never said nobody's existence matter's more than anybody else's. I'm a natural law theorists that desires