-
Actually you ignored two sources showing that regular random historical tribes lived on the brink of starvation. It doesn't matter if they have more vitamins because if you don't have calories, you die. Which is what I'm saying. It ALSO doesn't matter if tyranny causes more starvation because the point is that historically, all tribes
-
Zzzzzzzzzzz I don't care what Dr. Crazy observed. Merely being able to preserve food doesn't mean there's enough food to eat yearround. Here I'ma give you some citations so you can ignore them, but maybe you'll realize deep down that you're wrong. Here 's a source (yeah its an article, but it has a link to the research in
-
No phil. The biggest way in which historical man's diet differed from modern diets are seasonal periods of starvation. You want to spend all this time and energy crying about how plant fats are different from animal fats, but they're even more different than NOTHING. And NOTHING is what cavemen ate for months at a time (okay maybe some berries
-
[quote user="Livermore Jim"] So Dilorenzo in the first paragraph implies that Sherman was responsible for the mass murder of innocent civilians,[/quote] He implies no such thing. He says Sherman used the phrase. And it is now in use today. So in a way, he founded the modern PHILOSOPHY (read: not necessarily killin babies) of collective responsibility
-
Here 's a debate I did before I left ddo (because of trolling f~ckheads). It explains how debate is broken. The problem for you is that anarchy is an asymmetric argument. It is volumetrically larger for you to prove anarchy than it is for your opponents to argue against it. This means you cannot win even if you are right. Choose a different burden
-
I've been calling people religious wackjobs lately. Is it just me?
-
[quote user="limitgov"]There is so much info on the damage fake food does to your body and so much info on the healing good food does, you just merely have to do some google searching.[/quote] Okay so you're talking past me by shifting the goalposts. My claim was that FAT GAIN/LOSS (read: not necessarily cholesterol) is going to be basically
-
[quote user="Phil Ridley"]Sieben, I'd rather you weren't banned if you could be civil, because your questions and statements encourage good debate. I didn't come here expecting everybody to agree with me. I just wish you didn't have to add an insult to every question or crossed wire.[/quote] I just wish you didn't ignore
-
[quote user="limitgov"] Sieben, its not about eating a certain number of calories[/quote] I JUST posted a study showing that overeating causes you to gain weight. I can also point to studies where people underfeeding lose weight. Always. Where are your studies about the efficacy of eating the "right" foods? Here's a study showing
-
[quote user="Nielsio"]Maybe you should think how it comes off to other visitors when they see people resorting to such low grade interaction.[/quote] Low grade interaction? Then maybe you should ban Phil. That would take care of the low-grade interaction, since I'm quite "civil" around reasonable people. [quote user="Nielsio"