-
[quote user="Brainpolice"]This is precisely what is wrong with your philosophy. You use the problem of semantics to argue against *conceptual* distinctions, which is misleading.[/quote] If Brainpolice don't see how to counter our arguments against "natural law" crap, he just keep saying that we are using only semantic tricks
-
[quote user="Brainpolice"]pointing out some distinctions between the objectivist view and the libertarian anarchist view (namely, that objectivism retains the territorial monopoly on law) and clearly distinguishing minarchism from anarchism[/quote] There is no real distinction between your "anarchy" and objectivist minarchy. Where
-
[quote user="Brainpolice"]My body is not separate from me, and hence it is impossible for me "own" something that I AM. This is part of the whole dualism problem with self-ownership, I.E. it implies a dualism that does not exist. It contradicts the monism of "the person" or "the self".[/quote] Better term is individual
-
[quote user="GilesStratton"]The closet monarchists are coming to get us.[/quote] Closet monarchists? Yes : [quote user="GilesStratton"] The state is the result of a monarch monopolizing public opinion by means of appeals to egalitarian sentiment. [/quote]
-
I believe that such guys like mr1001bolsheviks and Chomsky are pseudo-anarchists. They are destroying anarchist movement from inside, making it indistinguishable from socialdemocracy and Marxism. I also think that exact same problem is with Hoppeans, but they at least often don't deny that they are not anarchists at all.