-
@Blargg I liked your post. I hope you write more about your thoughts on compliance.
-
@Clayton Same goes... let me know when the libertarian messiah shows up and makes trespass an impossibility so everyone can live in a free market. Government blah, blah, blah. And what would you do about a mafia or thug pda arising in a market with no state? Not a damn thing. Don't throw hypocrite arguments at me because I am going to point it out
-
@stupid ass fear mongering comments I haven't filed anything in over two decades. I have a sign on my car where a license plate is normally mounted that states "private property, not for hire, no licesne or registration required to travel, exempt from levy, consumer good" I do not carry any kind of government identification around. I am
-
@John James Schiff's argument was "show me the law." I do not dismiss the importance of Schiff's work but the work and arguments of those in his generation has evolved and there is now a far greater understanding is what is going on. God created the earth and gave it to man for his use. In God's system of nature man is whole and
-
RE: JSTOR said he's fine after he returned the data Fair enough. RE: I don't even understand 90% of what you said in your last post. Speak a language I can understand. So you can understand I dug up a link to a free book available online: A Treatise on the Law of Attachments, Garnishments, Judgments, and Executions by John R. Rood http://books
-
@Clayton RE: Y u no comprehend?? We were talking about judges on the bench . And what does that mean? What constitutes a court exactly? Judicial power? Administrative functions? A judgment? An order? A court of record v. non-record? The official record required to be maintained by law? Such questions are merely the beginning of a long list that must
-
@Clayton RE: Uh huh, yeah, I'm full of shit link According to your own link ... "Judicial immunity does not protect judges from suits stemming from administrative decisions made while off the bench ..." "Note, however, that, while the judiciary may be immune from lawsuits involving their actions, they may still be subject to criminal
-
In my opinion consent > NAP.
-
RE: English 101 My point was ... Citizen = Proper noun which is the name of a specific thing such as a title, and citizen = common noun which is defined as a generic thing or possession in a dictionary like Webster's. Therefore "Citizen of the United States" as it appears in the constitution up to the 14th Amendment is not identical to
-
It is not a corporate identity. It is a title of a citizen franchise of the incorporated body politic of a republic. Citizen of the United States. Proper nouns are capitalized. English 101. United States citizen = United States common noun = United States generic thing = United States possession. It is a title of a government office because in a republic