-
Proper classification would be "Concern Troll". Offering up questions while being elusive on your own positions doesn't contribute to anyone here.
-
"I'm really beginning to wonder if this is just a trolling expedition for you." A tap dancing troll expedition.
-
This is why you should never take celebrities, especially comedians, seriously.
-
John Edward... seriously? http://www.csicop.org/si/show/john_edward_hustling_the_bereaved/ So you offer no philosophical or scientific proof of any kind. Since the mind/body are inseparable, except for maybe death where the body ceases to function and what happens with consciousness thereafter is unknown and unprovable, I assert a person has self-ownership
-
Banks fail and people invested into such a risky scheme lose their money. That's the free market solution. There's no active process to prevent such scenarios, other than the fact that after it happens most people realize they behaved recklessly. But if people want to take such risks, why shouldn't they be allowed to?
-
@ Jackson LaRose For the purposes of this forum, scientific or philosophical proof.
-
There is a natural behavior mechanism at work that opposes things that are different. It's the same mechanism that attracts people to groups or government. The additional feature that government brings is the ability to coerce others without risk. As much as people may try to be objective, it's against human nature, which is largely subjective
-
Does someone have proof that the mind (sense of self) exists outside the body? Please share.
-
Are you using Occam's Razor as a guideline or are you using it in drawing a conclusion?
-
Even under Ron Paul's desire to end all current wars and remove personnel located on foreign soil there would be a military cultural/strategic argument that would have to be resolved. First, in the way wars are fought today as opposed to the past, there's a lot move emphasis on mobility and response time. This is the doctrine of projection of