-
Daniel, I was simply responding to the vein of this particular post and the ambivalent insults and charges of ignorance when nothing was being cited. Anyway, I saw the post that you just left about reading about Marx transcending phases from philosopher to political economist, and then your response saying that you must understand or be knowledgeable
-
The (sometimes self-proclaimed) opposite is evident judging from the posts in this thread.
-
It's hard to read, but is a necessary task if it's going to be debated. Kinda like what they teach us in school. Yet for some reason minimal and obvious standards such as that do not tend to apply in "debates" about Marx in mainstream academic culture. The Cold War, anyone?
-
You know, it's pretty amazing how none of you have even read Capital , but you are willing to call him ignorant? None of you are even able to state what Marx's relation to classical economics is . "Marx's claims" What about Marx's claims? He came from a school of classical economics, was incredibly well read and therefore was