-
[quote]I would have no obligation to testify against the thief, nor to allow access to my property if he were hiding on it.[/quote] Property used to break the non-aggression principle is no longer under its protection(to a proportional degree).
-
[quote]]I'd be an awfully big jerk not to give it back to you and then just have the two of us go after the thief, but it's not an obligation under the ethics of non-aggression.[/quote] Yes it is an obligation. By keeping a person from their stolen property you are an accomplice. [quote]Walter Block explains the concept as "negative homesteading"
-
What's wrong with it? Everything. "We actually found absolutely no evidence of any kind of disemployment effect in other words jobs being killed when the minimum wage went up...As I said the short and the long run effects were actually negliable." Immediately after denying correlation, he admits to correlation. The study included only
-
He links to my profile, but I don't believe any of those quotes are actually mine. I feel left out. http://polycentricorder.blogspot.com/2008/12/why-i-dislike-hoppeans-and-libertarian.html
-
[quote]Is that statistic true? I'd heard that, but I wasn't sure if more people were really killed in the Civil War alone than all other wars we've had.[/quote] More Americans. The American deaths in the civil war outnumber the American deaths in all other wars to present.
-
Expelled to the southern States a member of the federal legistature. The OP reminds me a popular saying: Lincoln caused the most dramatic political change this country has seen since the revolution (restructuring its government on a basis other than the voluntary ratification of the Consitution) and killing more Americans than all its other wars combined
-
If not directly then definately by extension, through the university monopoly.
-
[quote] 'it’ has every right to stop things form going on on its territory, hence to impose embargoes on whatever country it likes, search whichever ship it pleases and shoot whoever it finds to be guilty of anything. [/quote] Not even close. 1) Neither Gaza nor international waters are "part of their terrority". 2) No person or
-
Block's arguments concerning parasites are valid, I believe his analogy to be biologically false. A human fetus, rather than being a third party invader, is a part of the same body that it resides in. I think people tend to be willing to accept the fetus as a parasite because the egg leaves the ovary before implanting in the uteris. But it is probably
-
[quote]And I know that this next one will be a painful question - but what is the anarcho-capitalist's stand on abortion?[/quote] All believe that State has no role in it, beyond that there any many opinions. Block's ejectionism seems to be popular, though I don't find it valid.