Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Search

  • Re: Freedom of speech in context

    My mistake. Sorry, I'm new to this forum thing. I do not have time to spur up a counterpoint at the present moment but I'll get back to this when I can.
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Sun, Mar 13 2011
  • Re: Freedom of speech in context

    No need to be condescending. I'm not making a straw man because I'm not making an argument, it was a honest question. I do appreciate the input however, comparing defamation laws to copyright is interesting.
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Sun, Mar 13 2011
  • Re: Freedom of speech in context

    [quoteuser="Michael J Green"]I was convinced that a person does not "own" his reputation the first time I read Block. I am not so convinced that torts should be limited to property rights violations. An orderly society might need rules that deal with more than just property rights.[/quote] Do you feel denigration, even in the truthful
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Fri, Mar 11 2011
  • Re: Freedom of speech in context

    Michael J Green, Do you see defamation as a violation of property rights? If so, why?
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Thu, Mar 10 2011
  • Re: Freedom of speech in context

    Nero, You should check out Block's chapter on Free Speech in Defending the Undefendable . Let us know what you think of it.
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Wed, Mar 9 2011
  • Re: Some problematic scenarios

    [quoteuser="liberty student"]You're confusing contract with law. Two different things.[/quote] I followed you up until this point. What do you mean by this? How are they separated?
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Wed, Mar 9 2011
  • Re: Minarchists or Anarchists?

    [quote]Edit: and if one wants to achieve anarcho-capitalism through gradual reform, that can legitemately criticized as completetly utopian.[/quote] Minarchy can be criticized as utopian as well. If you suggest that the wrong people were at the helm then the question of "Where will you find the angels?" is relevant. I suggest to you that humans
    Posted to Newbies (Forum) by mahall on Tue, Mar 8 2011
  • Re: Limits to free speech

    How are defamation laws not boiled down to simply insult laws? Is it a crime to say "you have AIDS" or "your mother is a tramp"? (heh) If they were printed how is the scenario any different?
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Thu, Mar 3 2011
  • Re: No Religion is Libertarian

    [quote]See if you can do better than that aye... Making an actual argument would also be ideal.[/quote] No need to be condescending. I swear the arrogance on this forum sometime can kill enthusiam in the subject matter. Loosen up the collar and see that I'm merely displaying an alternate definition.
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Thu, Mar 3 2011
  • Re: No Religion is Libertarian

    [quote]Religion is a world view. Libertarianism is a political philosophy. So uhhh....[/quote] Lifted from wikipedia: "Religion is a cultural system that creates powerful and long-lasting meaning, by establishing symbols that relate humanity to truths and values[1]" Citation: "While religion is difficult to define, one standard model
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by mahall on Wed, Mar 2 2011
Page 1 of 15 (141 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last ยป | More Search Options