-
China wants to be paid back by countries that want to participate in the form of resources.
-
Azure wrote: <<< Isn't labor a cost of production? Just sayin'. >>> Sure. Labor is a commodity too.
-
Sieben wrote: <<< The intellectual dishonesty of the global warming movement is astounding. >>> Please provide evidence for this.
-
China has announced it's ambitious plan to link 17 nations with high speed rail networks, extending all the way to europe and malaysia. Read here .
-
xahrx wrote: <<< Actually since it's your implication they are receiving such money, it's your job to show it to be so. Burden of proof kind of thing. And then if you please, post the grant amounts given to the East Anglia crew, Mann, Schmidt, and other prominent AGW proponents, unless of course you would like to claim they are innocent
-
Poptech wrote: <<< Please provide what environmentalist organization you work for and how much you are paid. >>> I don't work for any environmentalist organization, and I am unbiased and independent, thank you.
-
Andrew Cain wrote: <<< That assumes that preferences remain constant. >>> No, I don't asume that. But as preferences change, also the consumption patterns change. And by the way, it could also be that we ran out of a certain flavour (temporarily), and then another flavour becomes favourite. But did our preference change, or was
-
Smiling Dave: <<< So the whole history of mankind is predetermined to the end of time. No point in arguingabout anything then, hey? >>> Now this is of course trying to make a mockery of this, but at the same time anyone accepts the fact that the outcomes of our decissions can be determined by conditions outside of us. As for instance
-
Sieben wrote: <<< You can't aggregate preferences. >>> Of course you can aggregate preferences. If there are 3 favlours of ice cream available on the market, it can of course be deterermined in aggregate which ice crea flavour is preferred. <<< The overall market price is the result of supply and demand, not the summing
-
Azure wrote: <<< You misunderstand. My statement was that the standard of living can never rise, as workers can never gain more value on average in terms of products purchased with wages than they give out in terms of labor, as the prices always hover around the value of labor. By this logic we should all still be in the stone ages but obviously