Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Search

  • Re: Two versions of anarcho-capitalism: David Friedman vs. Murray Rothbard

    [quote]"In polycentric law, the property owners decide what set of laws is used in their lands, and this is the definition of anarcho-capitalism used by Friedman." That is not correct. Not even close to correct.[/quote] Hmm, I've re-read some parts of Machinery of Freedom, and I think they seem to support my original statement. I have
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Sat, Jun 2 2012
  • Re: Two versions of anarcho-capitalism: David Friedman vs. Murray Rothbard

    [quote] That is not correct. Not even close to correct. The Machinery of Freedom is webbed on my site, if you want to find out what the system I am proposing actually is.[/quote] Thank you for your personal answer Professor Friedman. I have a copy of your book, but it's at my other aparment at the moment, so thanks for the information. [quote]=
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Sat, Jun 2 2012
  • Two versions of anarcho-capitalism: David Friedman vs. Murray Rothbard

    Many seems to think that anarcho-capitalism of the Murray Rothbard and David Friedman differs only in arguments, the former using "natural right" ones and the latter "consequentalists". I think that diversion is much more fundamental, and that their versions of anarcho-capitalism are different. The difference is simple, and it's
    Posted to Political Theory (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Fri, Jun 1 2012
  • Re: Is Civilization Evil?

    From the first.
    Posted to General (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Sun, May 20 2012
  • Re: Is Civilization Evil?

    One question F4M: What do you think about owning land property?
    Posted to General (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Sat, May 19 2012
  • Re: Is Civilization Evil?

    [quote][quote]It's not all about surviving the collapse. It's about adhering to the NAP. Ag and civ are inherently aggressive.[/quote] No it's not. I can do whatever I want in my agricultural property, including trading with the owner of the other agricultural property. It's all voluntary, and there is no aggression anywhere.[/quote
    Posted to General (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Tue, May 15 2012
  • Re: Is Civilization Evil?

    [quote][quote]It's not all about surviving the collapse. It's about adhering to the NAP. Ag and civ are inherently aggressive.[/quote] No it's not. I can do whatever I want in my agricultural property, including trading with the owner of the other agricultural property. It's all voluntary, and there is no aggression anywhere.[/quote
    Posted to General (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Mon, May 14 2012
  • Re: Is Civilization Evil?

    [quote]It's not all about surviving the collapse. It's about adhering to the NAP. Ag and civ are inherently aggressive.[/quote] No it's not. I can do whatever I want in my agricultural property, including trading with the owner of the other agricultural property. It's all voluntary, and there is no aggression anywhere.
    Posted to General (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Sun, May 13 2012
  • Re: Is Civilization Evil?

    [quote]When I tell people I'm an anarcho-capitalist and they ask me about the roads I ask them why do we NEED roads in the first place?[/quote] Oh no, Jesus Christ...
    Posted to General (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Fri, May 11 2012
  • Re: The First Church of Mises

    [quote]Proposed name: The Well-Being Society[/quote] ... Belive it or not, that's the direct translation for "welfare state" in Finland.
    Posted to General (Forum) by Chyd3nius on Wed, May 9 2012
Page 4 of 31 (309 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next > ... Last » | More Search Options