How should voters determine what politician to vote for? Who is “able” and “competent” enough to rule over others? If one were to accept the premise that somebody has to lead the nation by force (one which I do not accept), how would voters decide who to choose? Well, a reasonable way would be to look at past experience: “Let
It is often remarked that the existence of unions is proof of the inefficiency and failure of markets to pay workers adequate wages. That workers, as a great multitude with little individual influence, must form socialistic collectives in order to provide a counterweight to the great power wielded by corporations. Moreover, since unions have virtually
Scarcity can be defined as the ownership of something tangible which necessarily excludes others from using it. Thus, if I own a fork, I exclude others from using it, unless I either give it away or temporarily transfer availability of it to someone else, which in turn means I cannot at that point in time use it. Should someone steal it from me, the
Born of the fire, Fuelled by desire, Rises an idol forsaken by hell. This spirit of madness, the terror it wrought. None now remember, the havoc it sought. Enslaving our minds in the shackles of hate. Its emblem was blood, but its enemy fate. Yet now it revolves, breeds anew its disorder. With merciless lies, it coerces the truth. It proclaims itself