Free Capitalist Network - Community Archive
Mises Community Archive
An online community for fans of Austrian economics and libertarianism, featuring forums, user blogs, and more.

Search

  • Re: George Mason vs. Mises Institute

    George, My seeming lack of confidence on this issue is more to prevent stepping on toes in this forum. I think the evidence is definitely on the side of free banking. I do think fractional reserves would obtain. However given the unknown economic landscape of the future, what the reserve ratio would be (among other things) is something I wouldn't
    Posted to Economics Questions (Forum) by Othyem on Fri, Apr 22 2011
  • Re: George Mason vs. Mises Institute

    Thanks for the vote of confidence. Yes I'm aware of that argument. I think we can expect a higher reserve ratio, but it remains to be seen whether a 100 percent would be the eventual outcome. For what it's worth, I don't think that would happen.
    Posted to Economics Questions (Forum) by Othyem on Fri, Apr 22 2011
  • Re: George Mason vs. Mises Institute

    Since this thread has long devolved into a rather heated debate over free banking versus a 100 percent reserve standard, I just want to mention how arguments against free banking in particular seriously undermine the case for free markets in general. In essence one is committing to the idea that the market, in the absence of monopolistic force, will
    Posted to Economics Questions (Forum) by Othyem on Fri, Apr 22 2011
  • Re: "Big Business will Dominate the free market"?

    Tell him to go read Kevin Carson.
    Posted to Economics Questions (Forum) by Othyem on Wed, Apr 20 2011
  • Re: George Mason vs. Mises Institute

    I agree with everything George Selgin has said and am delighted he took the time to say it, too.
    Posted to Economics Questions (Forum) by Othyem on Wed, Apr 20 2011
  • Re: What are you reading?

    I always have to pause when I read comments like these. Is the significance of Austrian economics really reducible to what some would call an obscure and esoteric philosophical question? Even if we disagree with particular Austrians on some things such as free will or whether praxeology is the way to do economics or whatever, can't we still appreciate
    Posted to General (Forum) by Othyem on Sat, Apr 9 2011
  • Re: Who would you pick..

    Yes, the name. Good catch. I couldn't remember the spelling. All I'm saying is being polite helps.
    Posted to General (Forum) by Othyem on Fri, Apr 8 2011
  • Re: Who would you pick..

    Isn't the question about who would be the best at defending libertarianism? Surely knowledge of economics figures very importantly in that, but it doesn't take a professional economist to understand how voluntary exchange works. In any case, I don't think Long came to the subject yesterday. To my knowledge he has a very good understanding
    Posted to General (Forum) by Othyem on Fri, Apr 8 2011
  • Re: Who would you pick..

    Hands down, I would pick Roderick Long. Caplan is a good choice too, but in my opinion Long is always very persuasive in meeting criticism.
    Posted to General (Forum) by Othyem on Thu, Apr 7 2011
  • Re: Agent-Based Modelling in Economics

    I've been a fly on the wall in this forum for over a year now. I usually don't have the time to discuss at length any issue broached in here, so I usually just listen to what you all have to say. My first impression when I began visiting here was that many of the people were very knowledgeable about Austrian economics. I've since changed
    Posted to Economics Questions (Forum) by Othyem on Thu, Mar 17 2011
Page 2 of 2 (20 items) < Previous 1 2 | More Search Options