-
I'm talking about from an outside, general perspective or ranking. I know of WVU, Suffolk, NYU, GMU, etc. I saw a thread on here that said GMU is not very high in the rankings. What would be a more prestigious university?
-
I see nothing but trivial and straw man hypotheses. These hypotheses are used by novices. They don't address the fundamental issues with the actions and policies taken by the Federal Reserve. http://www.famguardian.org/Subjects/MoneyBanking/FederalReserve/FRconspire/FRconspire.htm
-
Done.
-
I'm not informed enough yet to know if this is nonsense or not. What do you think? https://www.facebook.com/notes/gregg-hilton/the-case-against-gold-why-ron-paul-is-wrong-about-the-gold-standard-by-gregg-hil/174671762589047 "The gold standard is to economics what the flat earth theory is to astronomy: something that may have seemed to make
-
I think your 90% is generous. It's probably 95%+. So, basically, the ideal situation is one in which there is an increase in housing prices that exceeds the costs of purchasing and owning the house. But, for people who simply want to buy a house and "settle down," and this includes other personal goals and aspirations they have, it's
-
Of course you are transferring something. That's what happens in the market when you purchase something. I exchange my money for a house of, hopefully, equal monetary value. However, I see your point. In this case, you have to assume you get back all of the price of the house. Then, he's comparing the cost of renting versus the cost of the purchasing
-
So, economics is a hobby for you? I'm strongly considering the M.A. in Mathematics at my university. This particular program is designed for those who want to teach at the junior college level, but there's nothing stopping me from taking the more advanced classes instead, i.e. the applied or pure math classes. I'm taking Advanced Linear
-
Well, in essence, you are losing money, because with a house, you are merely transferring your wealth and using that to live at the same time. It seems to me to be the better choice. Most of the time, you can simply transform that back into a more useful exchange medium, i.e. cash. Of course, a housing bubble burst can reduce the value of your wealth
-
But if you rent, you lose all of the money you spent on rent. You also don't have to sell if you're going to lose money.
-
Well, I know the definition of fiat. It's basically an arbitrary decree of the currency. There's no basis other than, "if it's good enough for us, it's good enough for you!" Yes, I watched the other two videos. I thought they were pretty good. I'm convinced. However, I wasn't following Peter Schiff's response to