-
Strangeloop, I deleted your second to last post which was just a personal shot at me. That's the second time you've had posts deleted this week for inappropriate content. You're at risk of losing your membership here if you continue to flaunt Daniel's rules.
-
[quote user="Smiling Dave"]Prateek, as a public service, could you provide the link to the banned from Mises forum? Or to Daniel's blog, at least?[/quote] I almost hate to admit this, I haven't banned a member in god knows how long, as I mostly handle stopping spam attacks and basic user account help. That forum of people angry at
-
[quote user="Rcder"] [quote user="liberty student"]Indisputable based on which facts?[/quote] Socialist orthodoxy, I imagine.[/quote] Technically, that would be hearsay and not facts. [quote user="Rcder"]By the way, I do have a chart showing rapid per capita GDP growth all throughout the 1800s, but I don't know how
-
I can define them, I just won't define them to you. I defined one of those terms to Z yesterday. Like I said, thanks for playing. ;)
-
That is so epic. I do wish my fan club had more winners in it, but I guess I have to start somewhere.
-
Ok, I'm done going in circles for one day. Thanks for playing James. Have a good morning, and remember, there is no state, no constitution, no congress and no president. :)
-
[quote user="liberty student"] [quote user="John James"]Depending on what you mean by "responsive", I believe I would agree.[/quote] Do you agree that a good faith discussion is one where both parties can ask questions and expect answers which respond to those questions?[/quote]
-
[quote user="John James"]Because you refused to follow through with your definition of a good faith discussion.[/quote] I appreciate that you now will admit you have not been responsive. I have tried to get you to participate in a fair and equal manner , but you keep insisting I should answer your questions under the flag of good faith, while
-
[quote user="John James"]I'm not sure if that's supposed to be a joke.[/quote] I most certainly am not joking. I want very much to have a good faith discussion with you. Here I defined a good faith discussion and asked for your agreement. Here you indicated you didn't understand what I meant. Here I tried to clarify what I meant
-
[quote user="John James"]Are you serious?[/quote] Absolutely. So do you agree with my clarification about what a good faith discussion entails?