-
The "green movement" is statist and is just using the fact that civ is unsustainable to impose more tyrannical statist policies. I don't pay them any attention.
-
And still possible to do so 100% aggression-free. Wrong. Civ REQUIRES aggression in order to sustain itself. Agriculture and dependence on ag caused states (violent monopolies) to form AND invade other lands. Ag destroys the land its done upon so the only way to keep ag going is to take over more virgin lands. This was the cause of all early state warfare
-
http://www.wilderness-survival.net/plants-1.php
-
Going into the woods is pure freedom. I was in the woods all today and never felt freer. Way better then living in civilization. And 100% non-aggressive too.
-
Ryan Faulk gives his own version of civ collapse.
-
[quote user="Freedom4Me73986"]Why do you care?[/quote] I wouldn't want you to look like a hypocrite and be ridiculed by potential converts to your primitivism. How am I a hypocrite? I've said again and again I dont plan on leaving civ YET until I've homesteaded enough land. Speaking of which: European central bank set to collapse
-
Aren't you supposed to be in the woods? And aren't you against using technology? Why do you care?
-
I don't respond to reddit the same reason why I don't go on facebook or tumblr: reddit is probably connected w/ the FBI/CIA and tracks your every move.
-
Ag and dependence on ag will undoubtedly lead to civ's demise. It already is.
-
Good luck, maybe you can form a tribe together. Or wait, that's too evil for F4M. I don't need a tribe to survive and no one else does either if they know enough to be 100% self-sufficient.