-
This disregards anarchy as a process, and imagines it as a fixed point in time. To actually make it to anarchy, we'd need a cultural shift in the people's understanding. Once this cultural shift occurs, I find it highly unlikely that anyone would agree with the guy who says "hey, let's create one coercive entity that forces people to
-
There aren't large economies of scale in the provision of protection.
-
He wasn't dead when the post was made...
-
Allow me to channel the voice of Spooner: That your whole claim of a right to any man's money for the support of your government, without his consent, is the merest farce and fraud, is proved by the fact that you have no such evidence of your right to take it, as would be required of you, by one of your own courts, to prove a debt of five dollars
-
Didn't find another thread on this, and I thought it deserved its own:
-
Blargg - I post when I can. I'm mainly dedicating my energy to growing the LibertyHQ forums: http://libertyhq.freeforums.org They will soon be merged with the main LibertyHQ website: http://thelibertyhq.org
-
That I'm now a top 10 contributor.
-
To understand competition, check out http://thelibertyhq.org/learn/index.php?articleID=257&parentID=32 The logic for workplace safety is similar - safety and comfort are just two attributes of a job, just like wage. Of course, bosses cannot violate the property rights of the workers by aggressing against them.
-
I've also thought about how much time people choose to use in making decisions, since time itself is something to be economized. Therefore, you ration your amount of time you want to spend on matching up your means to your ends.
-
I will respond to the OP later, but for the moment... idol, I am not sure whether those numbers are right: http://www.bls.gov/cps/minwage2012.htm I keep a close watch on this every year.