-
Tuckers rejection of Absentee-ownership deviates him from Capitalism. It should be stated, however, that in the case of land, or of any other material the supply of which is so limited that all cannot hold it in unlimited quantities, Anarchism undertakes to protect no titles except such as are based on actual occupancy and use.
-
I did. The quote that you posted is from a different person (and a hundred years later) than the quote I posted. I am also not sure the person quoted by you is an 'Anarchist Without Adjectives'. Whereas the person I quoted obviously is. Appealing to a long deceased *official* advocate of Anarchism Without Adjectives to convince the current
-
Both Bob Black and Noam Chomsky are mainstream anarchists? At least Post-left anarchy is interesting.
-
Normally, people read the sources prior to dismissing them as "obscure" "anecdotal" and "marginal." But we can't let facts get in the way of our theory, or *gasp* spend time reading.
-
As far as i can tell, that quote is not from an Anarchists Without Adjectives source. This following quote is. It isn't. Its from the famous Anarchist FAQ. Did you read the entire page that quote comes from? ... Hence "anarcho-capitalism", the very negation of anarchism, which has always been anti-capitalist. This confusion is also to
-
you seriously think that native americans would have sold their land? Try opening a history book - its a historical fact that Native Americans sold their land. As James Springer wrote: The native often took the initiative in such transactions, for he coveted the white man's goods as keenly as the settler yearned for more land.
-
how do you envision the colonists securing native american land from the appalachains to the pacific without resorting to coercion and before the spanish, english, french, russians, and later the canadians and mexicans taking the land instead ? By purchasing it.
-
Do you think that the US had cheaper alternatives to securing native american lands then aggression ? Yes, As Jennifer Roback said: Europeans generally acknowledged that the Indians retained possessory rights to their lands. More important, the English recognized the advantage of being on friendly terms with the Indians. Trade with the Indians, especially
-
Somehow, I don't think simply hand-waving and saying "The market will take care of it!" is going to satisfying to most noobs. Luckily, there is a long and detailed history of customary law.
-
I've got it on the mind since I'm reading HA for the first time. Would you agree that 'illogical' or 'unreasonable' would be the better desciptive word for a resort to coercive exchange? I hear what you are saying but action, by defintion, is rational. By Mises' definition Action is always rational, but that definitely is