-
The debate, if anyone cares to participate, would be between stateless legal monocentrism and stateless legal polycentrism. Most (if not all) anarcho-capitalists that I have ever met believe in legal polycentrism, I do not. That disagreement makes for the possibility of debate, no? Specifically (if my argument in the OP is accepted anyway), the debate
-
Minarchy as I've defined it is a stateless society with a monocentric legal order. I'm aware that this differs from the typical definition of minarchy, which is minimal statism. So why am I calling myself a minarchist? Because "anarcho-capitalistic jurisprudential-monocentrist" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue. Anarcho-capitalism
-
Which are better, ovens or chainsaws? In terms of what criteria are we judging one or the other to be better? Better for what? Do we mean better for baking pies or better for cutting lumber? Likewise, in order to settle the dispute between anarcho-capitalism and minarchism * , we must first decide what criteria we will use to judge which is better.