-
It follows only from argumentation, and it completely relies uppon it. see: http://argumentationethics.wordpress.com/2011/12/25/argumentation-ethics/
-
Hi, Can you please help me out on an academic assignment? which classical and modern works of arts (famous novels, plays, poems, paintings, sculptures ext.) feature distinct libertarian/classical liberal themes?
-
Hoppe’s Argumentation Ethics: A User Friendly, Neighborly Introduction
-
Another (neo-classical) critique by one Ilja Schmelzer. Skimming the article (another 50 pages critique... how can someone read those?) I see very familiar "objections" such as: He may only pretend to participate seriously, but really, in fact, this participation is only a joke. and a general equivocation of the formal concept of performative
-
Just for good order adding this critique called " Phenomenology and argumentation ethics" by Xavier Meulders . Browsing it briefly (24 pages... cmon...), despite the fancy phenomenological decor it seems to be the usual points of misunderstanding. If someone requires a more detailed response, he can ask.
-
Conza, I trust you wouldn't start expaining AE to a socialist... even if you would persuade him to some extent of AE it wouldn't make a difference. I find that simply explaining something simple such as the minimum wage can be a real mind opener.. I think It's a matter of practicality AFAIC..
-
If you'll please pass your frind my article , particularly the part on univasilization I belive will answer him fully.
-
I replied to the OP, you can see above.
-
Since the only valid non consequenstionlist justification I'm aware of are Argumentation ethics and to some extent de-Jassay's presumption of liberty, both highly complex, subtle and technical, and since the human psyche is very results rather than logical consistency oriented, and further since every ought presumes a can (you can't prescribe
-
TheOldGuy, you are correct. Hoppe's argument relates to justification not any and all speech acts.