-
Very incomplete list: Eric Hoffer, Ralph Ellison, Richard Mitchell, Thomas Szasz, Malcolm X, Neville, Wilhelm Reich, H.L. Mencken, Edward de Bono, Octavio Paz, Soren Kirkegaard, Alan Watts, Herman Hesse, Robert A. Johnson, Camille Paglia, Kahlil Gibran, C.S. Lewis, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Henry David Thoreau, Jerome K. Jerome, J. Krishnamurti, Robert Ringer
-
[quote user="Atreides99"]Say this mountain man who doesn't trade with anybody, does not receive any charity, and does not have any protection agency that he patronizes and then he goes out and murders someone. How is consent maintain while bringing this man to justice?[/quote] If this mountain man doesn't trade with anybody and apparently
-
The fact that there's no profit to be had from dead customers (unless you run a funeral home) isn't proof enough?
-
@Neodoxy So now you've gone from taking an off-handed swipe at me to a high-minded umbrage (and suddenly attributing to me a stance in an argument I wasn't a party to, to boot). I'm sorry that you can't seem to tolerate that you made an error, but you did, so how about you actually deal with it instead of insisting on weaseling out of
-
[quote user="Neodoxy"]You made no sense.[/quote] You're putting one strange assumption on top of another to disprove a hypothetical that wasn't even the point to begin with, and I'm the one not making sense. Okie dokie then.
-
[quote user="Neodoxy"]And therefore...?[/quote] And therefore you made no sense?
-
[quote user="Neodoxy"]"A and B hold X and Y. A gives X to B. B gives Y to A. A is happier and so is B, otherwise they wouldn't do it. Nothing else changed." Person C can still be worse off becuase if B had not exchanged with A then C would have been able to exchange with A at his critical price.[/quote] C would have been able
-
[quote user="John James"]It wasn't? Source?[/quote] It's right in the Letter to Ron Paul or their latest screed : If you do insist on obtaining RonPaul.com (it is the best Ron Paul related domain name), we could relocate our grassroots site elsewhere and sell you the domain name at its current market price of $250,000. That would include
-
I think Posner's wrong on this, particularly since implied contract is, in my eyes, irrelevant. Say, for example, that you see that a man has grabbed a woman and is threatening her with a gun to her head. You are armed, and not only do you have a clean shot at the gunman to end the situation, the gunman is unaware of you. So you take out your gun
-
[quote user="Wheylous"]From (what) I've read, the offer for RonPaul was always for $250,000. PLUS, they offered him RonPaul.org for free.[/quote] According to the documents filed with the UDRP, there was a prior email exchange in which the proprietor asked for $848,000. I noticed that the site admin at RonPaul.com avoided calling that