-
[quote]Why don't you move to North Korea?[/quote] Not enough market. I'm considering moving to Singapore .
-
Wouldn't a building as wide as that fall more or less into its own footprint?
-
depends on the cost
-
überempfindlich fotzen
-
[quote]No, you do not. A nation cannot have utility gains or losses, because a nation cannot act. Only individuals can have utility gains or losses.[/quote] The majority of individuals comprising various countries have chosen to adopt socialism. Happy? [quote]Still waiting on a reply to my previous post, btw.[/quote] I did reply to it.
-
[quote]You show me a majority of citizens (not voters) in a given country who "decided" to adopt socialism and I'll show you a bridge in Brooklyn I have for sale.[/quote] What the hell does "citizens" mean if you can't look at what people vote for?
-
Alright alright, screw banning fast food, that would greatly lower national social cohesion, but I still have a point about utility theory. Admit it.
-
Also, banning fast food may be a better solution than putting obese people in concentration camps.
-
[quote]What does this mean?[/quote] I don't know, but I thought it sounded profound. [quote]I don't trust your ability to predict how to properly solve the drug problem when billions of dollars in dozens of countries have failed to effectively do so.[/quote] They don't want to solve the problem. The CIA is active in the drug trade. Are you
-
[quote]While a majority of individuals can vote to ban the importation of automobiles from foreign countries, it cannot be said that a country "voted" or "chose" to ban said automobiles.[/quote] Actually, I believe that Rothbard acknowledged that you can say this if you clarify your terms. The fact that the majority of a given population