-
Anyways, I concede the point about concentration camps.
-
*most people
-
Nature, though through nurture people's behaviors can certainly be changed to some extent.
-
[quote]Such programs usually aren't that successful and a national policy that matched this would most likely cause a great deal of anguish and further body-image problems. Forcing them into "concentration camps"... Seriously? Does this sound like those in the fat "concentration camps" would be having a good time, miss out on
-
From the trailer it seems like my type of movie - are you planning to submit it to a film festival? EDIT: nevermind, didn't RTFT.
-
Hans-Hermann Hoppe, I like! :D
-
1. Countries = people voting. 2. So you reject Rothbard's reconstruction of utility economics. I'll give you an example: forcing overweight people into concentration camps to lose weight and banning heroin.
-
[quote]As soon as someone promotes something purely because it is "natural" is when you know that their a crank. Think about what you are doing right at this very instant. Is that natural? Really?[/quote] Conflict and knowledge seeking is certainly instinctual. Anyways, I never promoted Darwinism because it's natural, good point, the "empathy
-
[quote]Nope. I'm saying that evolution has bugger all to do with how 'strong' or 'weak' you are. Natural selection works on the basis of adaptibility , not some arbitrary interpretation of what Buzz Killington percieves to be 'frail'. If some of us have worked out how to convince society into giving us free healthcare, well
-
[quote]So, what you're saying is that in the last 1500-2000 years, humans have evolved new traits for, say, blindness, deafness, paraplegia, epilepsy, etc. etc.? These traits evolved de novo in the last 1500 years or so?? Forget history at this point, where is the science that shows this is even possible ?? It's like claiming we could evolve