-
I think im starting to understand this now. the government would bankrupt the citizens with such high amount of taxes that is needed for so many wars (building things which will get destroyed anyway). and after the wars then what? all those guns are pretty much useless. my goodness, think about how big the government will expand due to war.....
-
I think i understand it now. How could the people be cheering for the wealth that building the ships were created if they were just destroyed? It makes no sense right? If the firm had used materials to build houses or make foods etc. it would do more good than just building ptless ships to destroy them. Sound kind of like 1984 with the perpetual war
-
in regards to the broken window fallacy, I understand it since if the government wants to make jobs it will have to tax its people. and the taxes decrease the people'es wealth (and doesn't the government have to tax the workers that are working at the government jobs?). However what about in war? After ww2 the economy prospered. Was this merely
-
k thanks, I'll read that one once im finished with meltdown. I guess i have alot of reading to do before going into a debate...
-
thanks for the support. I guess i'll start with Meltdown first, then ill follow the reading list and once im smarter i'll read human action and road to serfdom.
-
what kinds of arguments should i expect against free markets/liberty/small governments? i already know that liberals will try to use emotion to sway ones opinions, they want to steal money from people to give money to poor people. I'm a beginner so does anyone know where I should start studying? (I already read: liberty defined, anatomy of the state