-
[quote]This is fine you can think this and i realy do understand what you think on this topic, but everyone else will continue to own land.[/quote] That doesn't make them right. And they will continue only untill socialist is established. [quote]lf. Even if the current land ownership has been distorted by the government, it is still a reality.[
-
[quote]it is another to start insulting them.[/quote] I don't know what hierarchy means. I don't know what giving orders means. What you wear affects me because I have to look at it. These kind of statemenets insult the one who puts them forth, and if anyone's insulting other people are those who write this kind of things, it insults the
-
[quote]Yes[/quote] Wow, Rothbard was a socialist. I'll learn all kinds of stuff here. [quote]Furthermore if he ever disagrees with exactly what the group decides what to do[/quote] He is a part of that group, meaning he is a part of all decision making. [quote]so you aren't a libertarian and you do support slavery[/quote] I've been saying
-
[quote]Virtually every decision anyone makes in some way or another affects others. For example, your decision to wear a blue shirt rather than a white shirt affects me insofar as I have to look at it[/quote] I told you to stop with the idiotic posts. [quote]Does it follow that I should "have a say" in what color shirt you wear?[/quote] I
-
@LFOD Your question is idiotic because by doing a survey you don't mix labor with anything. [quote]"products" are the output of labor, capital, and material. "property" is something that belongs to someone.[/quote] Property comes into existence as a product of labor and something that isn't a product of labor cannot be property
-
Here's an example. You take a rock, break a branch, use the rock to shape the branch to make a club, and voila- an act of original appropriation. You have the title of ownership (the right to exclusive use) over that club until you transfer it to someone else or declare it unowned.
-
Laertius, Lives, 7,10 According to Timaeus, he was the first to say, "Friends have all things in common" and "Friendship is equality"; indeed, his disciples did put all their possessions into one common stock. The second mentioned maxim goes against the notion that there was hierarchy among Pythagoreans, akousmatoi and mathematikoi
-
[quote]Why wouldn't that logic be applied to all property?[/quote] Because areas of land cannot be property. Property is products of labor, areas are not. [quote]But land is owned right now. So can not own land is incorrect because it is already occurring.[/quote] Are you really so malevolent, or so lazy to think? It is clear that I am not talking
-
[quote]delagated to a hierachy of ability, passion, values.[/quote] Which doesn't have anything to do with hierarchy as organization of people. Husband and wife are equals, they function same as a workers' cooperative, not like a capitalist firm. Marriage had a form where a man buys a woman from hew father and the women switches domestic masters
-
I suggest reading the entire book Anarchist FAQ, or at least the sections or chapters that interest you. Anarchist FAQ