-
[quote user="jdcoffey"]If restitution cannot be made, how is Justice served? [/quote] You could always execute the murderer.
-
[quote user="CorporateGhost"]I was wondering if libertarianism can only happen in a society in witch the average Joe understand the principals of sound economics like the business cycle theory,the forces of the market and its relation to the scarcity of resources,the impossibility of economic calculation in socialism,the complexity of the
-
[quote user="Byzantine"] I maintain a monopoly on rules for my property and if you don't abide by them, then I'll kick you out. Does this mean I run a "statist" household? [/quote] Statist bastard!
-
[quote user="Stephanie Bond"]I disagree. I do not accept that government must have the right to initiate the use of force in order to qualify as a government.[/quote] The initiation of coercion and force is immoral since it violates man's rights and render man's mind useless. A government is an institution which maintains a monopoly
-
[quote user="GilesStratton"] Brilliant, so when are we going to stop using the term. [/quote] As soon as possible...
-
[quote user="Stranger"] I'm a liberal. [/quote] Amen!
-
[quote user="Nick. B"]Social anarchism are anarchist schools of thought that base there ideal society on socialist economics. The main tenets are mutualism, communism, syndicalism, primitivism.[/quote] And this is why we true liberals (ancaps.) shouldn't work with those people.
-
[quote user="GilesStratton"] Hoppe already refers to the natural order, he does occasionally use the term anarchocapitalism, but not often. I think he understands the laws of the term. Sobran is also reluctant to use it, Rockwell also refers to it as private government as far as I know. [/quote] Hoppe has recognized that "anarcho-capitalism"
-
[quote user="wombatron"]Mutualism, for example, which can be pretty close to Rothbardian market anarchism[/quote] Ohh yes, the philosophy for thieves (mutualism) and that of private property (anarcho-capitalism/pure liberalism) are very close...
-
[quote user="Brainpolice"]The fact of the matter is that agorism is more left-libertarian friendly.[/quote] An advocate of agorism or counter-economics doesn't have to be left-leaning or more friendly towards such elements. One can very well be in favour of such actions (counter-economics) and not be positive of "leftist" elements