-
In the same way the vast majority of men prefer the accumulation of wealth compared to its destruction, the vast majority of men prefer peace to violence? Some of you may get where I'm coming from in the above. I'm thinking of the application of praxeology to human interaction, what could be called "ethics". Sort of inspired by Adam
-
That seems a little too vague and broad to me. Means: Abolition of class (what is class? in this scenario it is an irrelevant construct) Abolition of property End: Provide for the population Taken as above it can be viewed as correct, but it is so vague as to be useless, and it doesn't spell their goals out at all, in my mind. Do you get me? Thanks
-
I'm trying to work something out in my head about praxeology in general, and to do so I was trying to work out how praxeology shows socialists that their plans are flawed and contrast it to another problem. However, I immediately hit a speed bump because I can't work out what the goals of socialists are, and if they have them, why do they think
-
[quote user="scineram"] What do you mean grounding? Nazis will be ignored, punished if they are naziing. [/quote] Winner.
-
Fantastic. This and Seasteading has given me a lot of food for thought. These topics need to be talked about more and fleshed out completely.
-
http://mises.org/humanaction/chap35sec3.asp
-
How are you going to enforce your IP rights, Stranger?
-
It's pretty obvious Stranger has this thread won and it's truly disturbing how out of touch with reality some of you are.
-
It's obvious why LS asked the question.
-
[quote user="Daniel Muffinburg"] I'd say the parents have the responsibility to maintain the child. I fail to see how inserting Spidey's penis into a 3-year-old fits (no pun intended) in that role of responsibility. [/quote] [quote user="liberty student"] Is this a role based on your preference, or something grounded in objective